Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=4,233 Randomized Treatment

An Effectiveness Study Comparing Fluticasone Furoate (FF, GW685698)/Vilanterol (VI, GW642444) With Standard Treatment in Asthma

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01706198 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
4,233
Serious AEs
13.4%
Results posted
Jan 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: Percentage of Participants Who Have Either an Asthma Control Test (ACT) Total Score of >=20 or an Increase From Baseline of >=3 in ACT Total Score at Week 24. — 56; 71 Percentage of participants — p=<0.001
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
116citations · ~13 / year
Effectiveness of fluticasone furoate plus vilanterol on asthma control in clinical practice: an open-label, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.
Lancet (London, England) · 2017 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

This study is designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol Inhalation Powder (100mcg Fluticasone Furoate ((FF), GW685698)/25mcg Vilanterol ((VI), GW642444) or 200mcg Fluticasone Furoate ((FF), GW685698)/25mcg Vilanterol ((VI), GW642444) ) delivered once daily via a Novel Dry Powder Inhaler (NDPI) compared with the existing asthma maintenance therapy over twelve months in subjects diagnosed with asthma. This is a Phase III multi-centre, randomised open label study. Subjects who meet the eligibility criteria are randomised and will enter a 12 month treatment period.

Linked Publications (5)

  • Effectiveness of fluticasone furoate plus vilanterol on asthma control in clinical practice: an open-label, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.
    Lancet (London, England) · 2017 · 116 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Effects of switching from a metered dose inhaler to a dry powder inhaler on climate emissions and asthma control: post-hoc analysis.
    Thorax · 2022 · 109 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Patient-reported outcomes with initiation of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol versus continuing usual care in the Asthma Salford Lung Study.
    Respiratory medicine · 2018 · 21 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Effectiveness of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol on asthma control in the Salford Lung Study.
    The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2019 · 18 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Psychometric properties of the Asthma Control Test in 2 randomized clinical trials.
    The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2021 · 6 citations · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Who Have Either an Asthma Control Test (ACT) Total Score of >=20 or an Increase From Baseline of >=3 in ACT Total Score at Week 24.
56; 71 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Have Either an ACT Total Score of >=20 or an Increase From Baseline of >=3 in ACT Total Score at Weeks 12, 40 and 52.
62; 75; 60; 71; 58; 70 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Asthma Control (ACT Total Score >=20) at Weeks 12, 24, 40 and 52.
46; 61; 46; 60; 45; 58 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Have an Increase From Baseline of >=3 in ACT Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 40 and 52.
39; 55; 40; 54; 42; 53 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in ACT Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 40 and 52.
1.77; 3.31; 1.70; 3.20; 1.63; 3.00 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants in Each ACT Total Score Category (>=20, 16 to 19, <=15) at Weeks 12, 24, 40 and 52.
46; 61; 26; 20; 28; 18
SECONDARY
Annual Rate of Asthma-related Secondary Care Contacts
0.30; 0.30 0.786
SECONDARY
Annual Rate of Asthma-related Primary Care Contacts
1.42; 1.45 0.461
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Time to First Asthma-related Primary Care Contact
2119; 2114; 1621; 1599; 1208; 1214
SECONDARY
Annual Rate of All On-treatment Secondary Care Contacts
5.23; 5.17 0.822
SECONDARY
Annual Rate of All On-treatment Primary Care Contacts
10.61; 11.64 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Time to First Primary Care Contact
2119; 2114; 513; 483; 245; 242
SECONDARY
Mean Annual Rate of Severe Asthma Exacerbations
0.41; 0.40 0.697
SECONDARY
Time to First Severe Asthma Exacerbation.
654; 634 0.504
SECONDARY
Mean Number of Salbutamol Inhalers Prescribed for Each Participant Over the 12 Month Treatment Period.
8.0; 7.2 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Time to Modification of Initial Therapy
488; 563 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Have an Increase From Baseline of >=0.5 in Standardized Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire [AQLQ(S)] Total Score at Week 52.
43; 55 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Have an Increase From Baseline of >=0.5 in AQLQ(S) Environmental Stimuli Domain Score at Week 52.
50; 59 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Event (SAE) of Pneumonia
1; 1
SECONDARY
Time to First SAE of Pneumonia
16; 23 0.255
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Fatal SAEs of Pneumonia
3; 1
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With SAEs
284; 284
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)
109; 326

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Subjects eligible for enrolment in the study must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Informed consent: Subjects must be able to provide informed consent, have their consent signed and dated.
  • Type of subject: Subjects with documented GP diagnosis of asthma as their primary respiratory disease.
  • Current Anti-Asthma Therapy: All subjects must be prescribed maintenance therapy and receiving ICS with or without LABA (either a fixed combination or via separate inhalers), and for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 2.
  • Other background asthma medication such as anti-leukotrienes are permitted
  • All subjects on ICS monotherapy or ICS/LABA combination (this can be a fixed dose combination or an ICS alone or LABA alone in separate inhalers) must have had symptoms in the past week prior to Visit 2. Symptoms are defined by daytime symptoms more than twice per week, use of short-acting beta2-agonist bronchodilator more than twice per week, any limitation of activities, or any nocturnal symptoms/awakening. (The symptoms are based on subject's recall and are consistent with the GINA and in principal with the BTS/SIGN guidelines).
  • Subject questionnaires: Subjects must be able to complete the electronic subject questionnaires as well as those questionnaires that are completed by phone or provide a proxy e.g. a partner/relative/a friend who can do so on their behalf
  • Gender and Age: Male or female subjects aged ≥18 years of age at Visit 1. A female is eligible to enter and participate in the study if she is of:
  • Non-child bearing potential (i.e. physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who is post-menopausal or surgically sterile). Surgically sterile females are defined as those with a documented hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy or tubal ligation. Post-menopausal females are defined as being amenorrhoeic for greater than 1 year with an appropriate clinical profile, e.g. age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms. However in questionable cases, a blood sample with FSH > 40MIU/ml and estradiol <40pg/ml (<147 pmol/L) is confirmatory.

OR Child bearing potential has a negative urine pregnancy test at Visit 2, and agrees to one of the highly effective and acceptable contraceptive methods used consistently and correctly (i.e. in accordance with the approved product label and the instructions of the physician for the duration of the study - Visit 2 to the end of the study).

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects meeting any of the following criteria must not be enrolled in the study:

  • Recent history of Life-threatening asthma: Defined for this protocol as an asthma episode that required intubation and/or was associated with hypercapnea, respiratory arrest or hypoxic seizures within the last 6 months.
  • COPD Respiratory Disease: A subject must not have current evidence or GP diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
  • Other diseases/abnormalities: Subjects with historical or current evidence of uncontrolled or clinically significant disease. Significant is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the GP/ Investigator, would put the safety of the subject at risk through participation, or which would affect the efficacy or safety analysis if the disease/condition exacerbated during the study.
  • Drug/food allergy: Subjects with a history of hypersensitivity to any of the study medications (e.g., beta2-agonists, corticosteroid) or components of the inhalation powder (e.g., lactose, magnesium stearate). In addition, subjects with a history of severe milk protein allergy that, in the opinion of the GP/ Investigator, contraindicates the subject's participation will also be excluded.
  • Investigational Medications: A subject must not have used any investigational drug within 30 days prior to Visit 2 or within five half-lives (t½) of the prior investigational study (whichever is longer of the two), (if unsure discuss with the medical monitor prior to screening)
  • Chron
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01706198) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search