Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=426 Randomized Treatment

A Clinical Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/Emtricitabine/Rilpivirine (TDF/FTC/RPV) Versus TDF/FTC/Efavirenz (TDF/FTC/EFV) in Patients With Undetectable Plasma HIV-1 RNA on Current First-line Treatment

Human Immunodeficiency Virus-type 1 Infection
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01709084 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
426
Serious AEs
6.4%
Results posted
Jan 2017
Primary outcomePrimary: Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus - Type 1 Ribonucleic Acid (HIV-1 RNA) Levels Less Than (<) 400 Copies Per Milliliter (Copies/mL) at Week 48 — 93.9; 96.2 Percentage of Participants
◆ Published Evidence
No publication linked

No peer-reviewed publication reporting this trial's results has been linked yet. This can indicate results are unpublished — a known publication-bias signal. We re-check periodically.

Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate noninferiority (a new treatment is equivalent to standard treatment) in terms of the percentage of patients who have plasma human immunodeficiency virus-type 1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels less than 400 copies per mL after 48 weeks of randomized treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine/rilpivirine (TDF/FTC/RPV) versus TDF/FTC/efavirenz (TDF/FTC/EFV).

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus - Type 1 Ribonucleic Acid (HIV-1 RNA) Levels Less Than (<) 400 Copies Per Milliliter (Copies/mL) at Week 48
93.9; 96.2
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48
93.9; 96.2
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels More Than or Equal to (>=) 400 Copies/mL at Week 48 Based on Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) [Non-virologic Failure Censored] Imputation Method.
0.5; 0.5
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels >= 50 Copies Per Milliliter (Copies/mL) at Week 48 Based on Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) [Non-virologic Failure Censored] Imputation Method.
1.5; 1.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participant With Treatment Adherence Based on Tablet Count
97.2; 97.6
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor (N[t]RTI) or Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor (NNRTI) Mutations
0; 0

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Documented human immunodeficiency virus-type 1 (HIV-1) infection Patients who have been receiving first line highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for at least 1 year before the screening visit Patients who have been taking the same ARV combination for at least 8 weeks before the screening visit and are expected to continue on this regimen throughout the screening period.

Patients who prefer to change the current HAART regimen for reasons of simplification and/or toxicity of nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (N[t]RTI) Plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL and CD4+ cell count higher than 200 per mm3 at the screening visit Agrees to protocol-defined use of effective contraception

Exclusion Criteria

History of virologic failure (2 consecutive plasma HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) more than or equal to 400 copies per mL) while on previous or current ART History of immunologic failure (2 consecutive CD4+ cell counts during HAART treatment falling below the pre-HAART level) History of any primary N[t]RTI or NNRTI mutations Has a previously documented HIV-2 infection Significantly decreased hepatic function or hepatic insufficiency or diagnosed with acute clinical viral hepatitis Diagnosed with Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection Severe laboratory abnormalities Creatinine clearance less than 50 mL per minute Addicted to drug, including alcohol or recreational drugs

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01709084). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search