Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=463 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

A Study To Determine The Efficacy And Safety Of Tigecycline Compared With Imipenem/Cliastatin to Treat Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01721408 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
463
Serious AEs
10.3%
Results posted
Apr 2018
Primary outcomePrimary: Clinical Response at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Assessment Within the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population — 89.9; 96.6; 10.1; 3.4 percentage of participants — p=0.0008
◆ Published Evidence
Emerging
12citations · ~2 / year
A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, comparison study of the efficacy and safety of tigecycline to imipenem/cilastatin to treat complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalized subjects in China.
Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2018 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

This is a comparative study of the efficacy and safety of tigecycline to imipenem/cilastatin in hospitalized patients with a complicated intra-abdominal infection.

Linked Publications

  • A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, comparison study of the efficacy and safety of tigecycline to imipenem/cilastatin to treat complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalized subjects in China.
    Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2018 · 12 citations · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Clinical Response at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Assessment Within the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population
89.9; 96.6; 10.1; 3.4 0.0008 sig
PRIMARY
Clinical Response at the TOC Assessment Within the Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population
82.8; 88.7; 10.3; 3.5; 6.9; 7.8 0.0040 sig
SECONDARY
Clinical Response at the TOC Assessment Within the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population
88.0; 95.3; 12.0; 4.7 0.0277 sig
SECONDARY
Microbiological Response at the Subject Level in the ME Population at the TOC Assessment
88.0; 95.3; 2.7; 0.0; 97.3; 100.0 0.0277 sig

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Hospitalized male or female subjects, at least 18 year of age.
  • Complicated intra-abdominal infection is present at most under two weeks duration.
  • Minimal clinical criteria at the time of intra-abdominal infection diagnosis or highly suspected intra-abdominal infection.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Anticipated length of antibiotic therapy less than 5 days or the likelihood that the subject will not complete the course of treatment.
  • Intra-abdominal infection known to be caused by 1 or more bacterial pathogens not susceptible to both of the study drugs.
  • Had accepted non-study antibiotics more than 24 hr within 72 hrs before enrollment except for subjects declared prior failures.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01721408) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search