Early Phase 1
N=48
Users Study Of The Caverject Delivery System
Healthy
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01747928 ↗Enrolled (actual)
48
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Delivery System Success Rate (DSSR) — 66.67; 66.67; 100.00; 100.00 percentage of participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Interventions
- dual-chamber syringe (Other)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 40+ yrs
- Sex
- Male
- Sponsor
- Pfizer
- Primary completion
- Mar 2013
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Delivery System Success Rate (DSSR) |
66.67; 66.67; 100.00; 100.00; 100.00; 83.33 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Categorical Responses to the Participant Assessment Tool (PAT): Instructions Provided Were Useful? |
5; 5; 6; 5; 6; 5 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Categorical Responses to the PAT: Instructions Provided Were Clear? |
5; 4; 6; 6; 6; 5 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Categorical Responses to the PAT: Most Difficult Step? |
5; 3; 4; 5; 6; 4 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Categorical Responses to the PAT: Syringe Easy to Use? |
4; 3; 5; 6; 6; 5 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Providing Responses to Any Question on the PAT |
1; 1; 0; 0; 0; 1 | — |
| SECONDARY Time Required to Perform Segments 1 to 5 |
148.8; 189.3; 176.0; 194.3; 246.5; 168.2 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q1 |
5; 6; 6; 6; 6; 5 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q2 |
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Whom the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q3 |
5; 6; 6; 6; 6; 5 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q4 |
5; 6; 6; 6; 6; 5 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q5 |
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q6 |
5; 5; 6; 6; 6; 5 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q7 |
5; 5; 6; 6; 6; 5 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q8 |
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Whom the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q9 |
5; 5; 6; 6; 6; 5 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q10 |
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q11 |
5; 5; 6; 6; 6; 5 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q12 |
5; 5; 6; 6; 6; 5 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q13 |
1; 1; 0; 0; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q14b |
5; 5; 6; 6; 6; 5 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q16 |
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q17 |
5; 5; 6; 0; 6; 5 | — |
Summary
Usability testing of the dual-chambered syringe in conjunction with the proposed patient instructions for use.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Healthy males
Exclusion Criteria
- Inability to read English;
- physical limitations preventing participant from operating the syringe
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01747928). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.