Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Early Phase 1 N=48

Users Study Of The Caverject Delivery System

Healthy

Enrolled (actual)
48
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Delivery System Success Rate (DSSR) — 66.67; 66.67; 100.00; 100.00 percentage of participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Early Phase 1
Interventions
dual-chamber syringe (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 40+ yrs
Sex
Male
Sponsor
Pfizer
Primary completion
Mar 2013

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Delivery System Success Rate (DSSR)
66.67; 66.67; 100.00; 100.00; 100.00; 83.33
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Categorical Responses to the Participant Assessment Tool (PAT): Instructions Provided Were Useful?
5; 5; 6; 5; 6; 5
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Categorical Responses to the PAT: Instructions Provided Were Clear?
5; 4; 6; 6; 6; 5
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Categorical Responses to the PAT: Most Difficult Step?
5; 3; 4; 5; 6; 4
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Categorical Responses to the PAT: Syringe Easy to Use?
4; 3; 5; 6; 6; 5
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Providing Responses to Any Question on the PAT
1; 1; 0; 0; 0; 1
SECONDARY
Time Required to Perform Segments 1 to 5
148.8; 189.3; 176.0; 194.3; 246.5; 168.2
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q1
5; 6; 6; 6; 6; 5
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q2
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Whom the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q3
5; 6; 6; 6; 6; 5
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q4
5; 6; 6; 6; 6; 5
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q5
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q6
5; 5; 6; 6; 6; 5
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q7
5; 5; 6; 6; 6; 5
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q8
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Whom the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q9
5; 5; 6; 6; 6; 5
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q10
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q11
5; 5; 6; 6; 6; 5
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q12
5; 5; 6; 6; 6; 5
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q13
1; 1; 0; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q14b
5; 5; 6; 6; 6; 5
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q16
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Which the Observer Had Categorical Responses to in the OAT: Q17
5; 5; 6; 0; 6; 5

Summary

Usability testing of the dual-chambered syringe in conjunction with the proposed patient instructions for use.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Healthy males

Exclusion Criteria

  • Inability to read English;
  • physical limitations preventing participant from operating the syringe
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01747928). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search