Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=60 Randomized Single-blind Diagnostic

Hemodynamic Responses During Induction: Comparison of Marsh and Schnider Pharmacokinetic Models

Healthy

Enrolled (actual)
60
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: SVI (Stroke Volume Index) Value Change From Baseline Level at the End of the First 25 Minutes. — -31.1; -31.7 ml/beat/m^2

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Marsh Plasma TCI with high initial target (Procedure); Schnider Plasma TCI with high initial target (Procedure)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Primary completion
Jan 2013

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
SVI (Stroke Volume Index) Value Change From Baseline Level at the End of the First 25 Minutes.
-31.1; -31.7
SECONDARY
NI (Narcotrend Index) Reduction
SECONDARY
CVP (Central Venous Pressure)

Summary

To compare the hemodynamic changes during anesthesia induction between Marsh and Schnider plasma TCI models. We put forward a hypothesis that, if one TCI model is associated with much more prominent vasodilation effect or cardiac depression, a more sharp decrease in mean arterial pressure, systemic vascular resistance , central venous return or stroke volume would be observed.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients between the ages of 18 years and 70 years
  • ASA physical status I and II
  • surgical procedures requiring general anesthesia with continuous CVP and arterial pressure monitoring.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients younger than 16 y or older than 65 y
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) 30
  • emergency surgery
  • allergy to any of the drugs used
  • inability to communicate effectively
  • severe cardiovascular dysfunction
  • patient refusal and patients on long-term opioids or sedative medication.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01759160). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search