Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=402 Randomized Treatment

Study Comparing the Efficacy of MEK162 Versus Dacarbazine in Unresectable or Metastatic NRAS Mutation-positive Melanoma

Metastatic or Unresectable Cutaneous Melanoma

Enrolled (actual)
402
Serious AEs
31.6%
Results posted
Mar 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 — 2.83; 1.51 Months — p=< 0.001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
MEK162 (Drug); Dacarbazine (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Pfizer
Primary completion
Dec 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1
2.83; 1.51 < 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Overall Survival (OS)
10.97; 10.09 0.499
SECONDARY
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
15.2; 6.8; 22.7; 9.8 0.015 sig
SECONDARY
Time to Response (TTR)
1.45; 2.79
SECONDARY
Duration of Objective Response (DOR)
6.87; NA
SECONDARY
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
58.4; 24.8
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
269; 104; 95; 26
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03
7; 2; 17; 13; 9; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03
27; 5; 8; 2; 14; 4
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs
4; 1; 3; 1; 43; 8
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values
32; 8; 7; 1; 5; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Cardiac Events
35; 2
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examination
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Ocular Events
6; 0
SECONDARY
Plasma Concentration of Binimetinib
64.4; 182; 313; 321; 153; 101
SECONDARY
Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in Global Health Status Score of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30)
2.79; 4.27
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
68.35; 70.50; -5.75; -1.81; -8.63; 0.00
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
0.7780; 0.7657; -0.0422; 0.0110; -0.0397; 0.0132
SECONDARY
Time to Definitive 1 Point Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)
NA; NA 0.995
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)
193; 82; 76; 31; 0; 1
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at Baseline
0; 1; 100; 51; 32; 17

Summary

Two-arm, randomized, prospective, open-label, multi-center, phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of MEK162 (45 mg BID) versus dacarbazine (1000 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks) in patients with advanced (Stage IIIC) unresectable or metastatic (Stage IV) NRAS Q61 mutation-positive cutaneous or unknown primary melanoma. The mutation analysis will be performed at a central laboratory. Only those patients with Q61 mutation per central laboratory and meet all eligibility criteria will be randomized. A total of 393 patients will be randomized 2:1 to receive either MEK162 or dacarbazine. Patients will be stratified according to AJCC stage (IIIC, IVM1a, and IVM1b versus IVM1c), ECOG Performance status (0 versus 1) and any prior number of lines of immunotherapy (immunotherapies versus none). This study will use an Interactive Response Technology (IRT). The primary end point of the study is progression-free survival. Key secondary end point is overall survival

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosis of locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic cutaneous or melanoma of unknown primary AJCC Stage IIIC or IV (uveal and mucosal melanoma are excluded)
  • Presence of NRAS Q61 mutation in tumor tissue prior to randomization as determined by a Novartis designated central laboratory
  • Naïve untreated patients or patients who have progressed on or after any number of prior lines of immunotherapy for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic melanoma
  • Evidence of at least one measurable lesion as detected by radiological or photographic methods
  • Adequate bone marrow, organ function, cardiac and laboratory parameters
  • Normal functioning of daily living activities

Exclusion Criteria

  • Any untreated CNS metastases
  • Uveal or mucosal melanoma
  • History of or current evidence of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) or risk factors of RVO
  • Patients with washout period < 6 weeks from the last dose of ipilimumab or other immunotherapy.
  • Previous systemic chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic melanoma.
  • History of Gilbert's syndrome
  • Prior therapy with a MEK- inhibitor
  • Impaired cardiovascular function or clinically significant cardiovascular diseases
  • Uncontrolled arterial hypertension despite medical treatment
  • HIV positive or active Hepatitis A or B
  • Impairment of gastrointestinal function
  • Patients who have undergone major surgery or radiotherapy ≤ 3 weeks prior to starting study drug or who have not recovered from side effects of such procedure;
  • Patients with neuromuscular disorders that are associated with elevated CK.
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women
  • Medical, psychiatric, cognitive or other conditions that may compromise the patient's ability to understand the patient information, give informed consent, comply with the study protocol or complete the study

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01763164). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search