N/A
N=14
Nudging Guideline-concordant Antibiotic Prescribing Using Public Commitments
Acute Respiratory Infections (ARIs)
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01767064 ↗Enrolled (actual)
14
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing for Patients With Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI) — 33.7; 52.7 inappropriate prescribing events
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Posted commitment letter (Other)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- University of Southern California
- Primary completion
- May 2012
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing for Patients With Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI) |
33.7; 52.7 | — |
Summary
Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections (ARIs) persists despite decades of intervention efforts. Negative outcomes of inappropriate antibiotics include increased costs of care, adverse drug reactions, and rising prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. To address this public health problem, we apply the principles of commitment and consistency in an effort to influence clinician decision-making through the implementation of a low-cost behavioral "nudge" in the form of a simple public commitment device. Clinicians were asked to post in their exam room a signed letter indicating their commitments to reducing inappropriate antibiotic use for ARIs. Our hypothesis is that clinicians displaying the poster-sized commitment letters will decrease their inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for ARIs as compared to clinicians in the control condition (with no posted letter).
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Medical professionals licensed to provide care and prescribe medications (including antibiotics)
- Treating adult patients (18 years of age and older) from 5 Los Angeles community clinics
Exclusion Criteria
- none
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01767064). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.