Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=64 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Study of Aortic Root Reimplantation Procedure

Ascending Aortic Aneurism · Aortic Valve Insufficiency

Enrolled (actual)
64
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Freedom From Aortic Insufficiency More Than 2+ (Percentage, Kaplan-Meier) — 88.2; 87.7 percentage of participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Aortic Root Reimplantation Procedure (Procedure); Aortic Valve Reimplantation Procedure (Procedure)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation
Primary completion
Nov 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Freedom From Aortic Insufficiency More Than 2+ (Percentage, Kaplan-Meier)
88.2; 87.7
SECONDARY
Survival (Percentage, Kaplan-Meier)
82.7; 84.6

Summary

Authors hypothesize that aortic root reimplantation procedure is superior over standard aortic valve reimplantation procedure in the incidence of aortic valve replacement.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Aortic insufficiency 2+
  • Ascending aorta or aortic root of greater than 4.5 cm (> 4.0 cm in Marfan syndrome)
  • Good conditions of aortic cusps

Exclusion Criteria

  • Aortic annulus more than 32 mm
  • Aortic cusps destruction
  • Critical aortic cusps elongation
  • Aortic root dissection
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01787604). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search