N/A
N=102
Relationship Between Bladder Distention and Hysteroscopy Application
Menorrhagia
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01848847 ↗Enrolled (actual)
102
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: Ease of Cervical Entry — 4.00; 3.55 units on a scale
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Hysteroscopy (Procedure)
- Age
- Pediatric, Adult · 17+ yrs
- Sex
- Female
- Sponsor
- Namik Kemal University
- Primary completion
- Jul 2013
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Ease of Cervical Entry |
4.00; 3.55 | — |
| PRIMARY Pain Scoring(VAS) |
2.52; 1.95 | — |
| SECONDARY Patient Acceptability and Pain Scoring |
— | — |
| SECONDARY Procedure Duration |
— | — |
Summary
The purpose of the study is to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of bladder filling during hysteroscopy procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Women who are at reproductive age
- Women who are not pregnant at the time of presentation
- Women who are not nulliparous
Exclusion Criteria
- Women who have previous cervical surgery or cervical incompetence.
- Women who have genitourinary infection
- Women who have profuse uterine bleeding or recent uterine perforation
- Women who have neurological disorders affecting evaluation of pain.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01848847). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.