N/A
Completed N=21
CNAP Accuracy in the Bariatric Surgery Population
Bariatric Surgery
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01896206 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
21
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2015
Primary outcomePrimary: The Absolute Difference in Mean Arterial Pressure Between the Arterial Catheter and the CNAP. — 7.7 mmHg
Summary
This study will compare accuracy of a newly developed monitor for continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring (CNAP™ Monitor 500; CNSystems Medizintechnik AG, Graz, Austria) that provides beat-to-beat BP readings with two of the current and more commonly used intermittently oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure device (NIBP), and the invasive arterial line (IBP).
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY The Absolute Difference in Mean Arterial Pressure Between the Arterial Catheter and the CNAP. |
7.7 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients who are scheduled for laparoscopic bariatric surgery for the treatment of obesity
- Patients in whom an indwelling arterial cannula will be placed for the surgical procedure
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients with history of a peripheral neurologic or neuropathic disorder
- Patients in whom an invasive arterial cannula cannot be placed
- Patients with vascular implants at the sites of non-invasive blood pressure measurement (fingers and upper arm of the examined arm)
- Edematous patients
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01896206). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.