N/A
N=21
CNAP Accuracy in the Bariatric Surgery Population
Bariatric Surgery
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01896206 ↗Enrolled (actual)
21
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2015
Primary outcome: Primary: The Absolute Difference in Mean Arterial Pressure Between the Arterial Catheter and the CNAP. — 7.7 mmHg
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- CNAP monitor (Device)
- Age
- Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Joseph D. Tobias
- Primary completion
- Dec 2013
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY The Absolute Difference in Mean Arterial Pressure Between the Arterial Catheter and the CNAP. |
7.7 | — |
Summary
This study will compare accuracy of a newly developed monitor for continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring (CNAP™ Monitor 500; CNSystems Medizintechnik AG, Graz, Austria) that provides beat-to-beat BP readings with two of the current and more commonly used intermittently oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure device (NIBP), and the invasive arterial line (IBP).
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients who are scheduled for laparoscopic bariatric surgery for the treatment of obesity
- Patients in whom an indwelling arterial cannula will be placed for the surgical procedure
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients with history of a peripheral neurologic or neuropathic disorder
- Patients in whom an invasive arterial cannula cannot be placed
- Patients with vascular implants at the sites of non-invasive blood pressure measurement (fingers and upper arm of the examined arm)
- Edematous patients
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01896206). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.