Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=682 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

A Comparator Study of Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray Verses (vs) Cetirizine in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial and Seasonal

Enrolled (actual)
682
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Mean Change From Baseline (CFB) in the Individual AM Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (rTNSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period — -2.2; -1.9; -1.5; -0.9 Scores on a scale — p=0.278

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
FPNS (Drug); FPNS Placebo (Drug); Cetirizine (Drug); Cetirizine Placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Primary completion
Oct 2013

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Change From Baseline (CFB) in the Individual AM Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (rTNSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period
-2.2; -1.9; -1.5; -0.9 0.278
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the Individual AM Reflective Nasal Symptom Scores for Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, and Sneezing Over the Entire Treatment Period
-0.5; -0.4; -0.3; -0.2; -0.6; -0.5
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (NRQLQ) Overall Score at Visit 3/Early Withdrawal.
-1.0; -0.6; -0.8; -0.5
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the AM Pre-dose Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period
-1.9; -1.3; -1.2; -0.6
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the AM Pre-dose Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period
-1.6; -1.4; -1.2; -0.8
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the AM Pre-dose Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Score (iTOSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period
-1.3; -1.1; -1.1; -0.5
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the Combined Nasal and Ocular Reflective Total Symptom Score (rTSS = rTNSS+rTOSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period
-3.9; -3.4; -2.7; -1.7

Summary

This phase IV investigational trial is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a 2-week treatment of fluticasone propionate nasal spray (FPNS) vs. cetirizine on allergic nasal and ocular symptoms and quality of life in adult subjects with SAR. It is hypothesized that FPNS provides greater nasal symptom relief than cetirizine. The primary measure used to test this hypothesis is the change from baseline over two weeks in reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) compared between FPNS and cetirizine. Approximately 648 subjects will be randomized into a 1:1:1:1 ratio of treatment allocation across approximately twenty-five to thirty-five sites in the US during the 2013 fall allergy season. All subjects will be outpatients. The total duration of study will be approximately 21 days including 7 days of screening period, and 14 days of treatment period.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Informed consent: Subject must give their signed and dated written informed consent to participate. Subject must understand and be willing, able, and likely to comply with study procedures and restrictions. Subject must be able to read, comprehend, and record information in English.
  • Subject is treatable on an outpatient basis.
  • Age: >=18 years of age at Visit 1.
  • Gender: Male or eligible female subjects. A female subject is eligible to participate if she is of non-childbearing potential (i.e., physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who is post-menopausal or surgically sterile). Surgically sterile females are defined as those with a documented hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy or tubal ligation. Post-menopausal females are defined as being amenorrhoeic for greater than 1 year with an appropriate clinical profile, e.g., age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms. OR Childbearing potential with a negative pregnancy test at screening and agreeable to using one of the acceptable contraceptive methods consistently and correctly (i.e., in accordance with the approved product label and the instructions of the physician for the duration of the study). An eligible female is also not lactating nor planning on becoming pregnant during the study.
  • Diagnosis of SAR, defined as documented clinical history or physician verification of subject reported historical SAR during each of the last two fall allergy seasons and a positive skin prick test (wheal >=3 millimeter [mm] larger than the negative control) to a prevalent local fall allergen within 12 months prior to Visit 1 or at Visit 1.
  • Adequate exposure to local fall pollen: Subject resides within a geographical region where exposure to the local fall pollen to which they are sensitized is expected to be moderate or greater during the study period. Subject does not plan to travel outside the geographical region where exposure to local fall pollen to which they are sensitized is expected to be moderate or greater for more than 48 hours during the study period.

At Visit 2, the subject must meet the following criteria

  • Eligible subjects will need to have moderate to severe SAR symptoms, defined as a morning rTNSS of >=7 on at least four of the last seven days leading up to randomization. This includes the AM assessment on the morning of the randomization visit at Visit 2.
  • Subjects should demonstrate at least a 70% compliance rate with both their placebo run-in study medications and their e-diary completion prior to randomization. This period includes the day of Visit 1 until the day before randomization at Visit 2.
  • Subjects should have no significant change in medical condition(s) that would have been exclusionary at Visit 1.
  • Subjects should not have used any prohibited medications that are detailed in the inclusion/exclusion criteria (including prohibited allergy medications).
  • Subjects should not have travelled outside the local pollen region for more than 48 hours during the run-in period.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Significant concomitant medical conditions, defined as but not limited to:

Historical or current evidence of a clinically significant uncontrolled disease of any body system (e.g., tuberculosis, psychological disorders, eczema, uncontrolled asthma). Significant is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the safety of the subject at risk through study participation or which would confound the interpretation of the study results if the disease/condition exacerbated during the study.

A severe physical obstruction of the nose (e.g., deviated septum or nasal polyp) or nasal septal perforation that could affect the deposition of intranasal study drug.

Nasal (e.g., nasal septum), ocular, or throat injury, or surgery to these areas in the last 3 months.

Rhinitis medicamentosa. Bacterial or viral infection (e.g., common cold) of the eyes or upper respiratory tract within tw

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01916226). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search