Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=608 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Desloratadine (MK-4117) in Japanese Participants With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (MK-4117-200)

Perennial Allergic Rhinitis

Enrolled (actual)
608
Serious AEs
0.2%
Results posted
Aug 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Assessed by the Investigator at Week 2 — -1.96; -1.94; -1.87 Score on a Scale — p=0.661

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Desloratadine 5 mg (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult · 12+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Organon and Co
Primary completion
Jan 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Assessed by the Investigator at Week 2
-1.96; -1.94; -1.87 0.661
PRIMARY
Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)
27; 29; 20
PRIMARY
Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Drug Due to an AE
1; 0; 2
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Assessed by the Investigator at Day 3 and Week 1
-1.12; -1.11; -0.63; -1.39; -1.39; -1.48 0.010 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Nasal Symptom Sub-Scores Assessed by the Investigator
-0.21; -0.29; -0.13; -0.27; -0.36; -0.38 0.547
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Nasal Finding Score Assessed by the Investigator
-0.23; -0.17; -0.13; -0.35; -0.31; -0.34 0.376
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Eye Symptom Score Assessed by the Investigator
-0.17; -0.24; -0.13; -0.28; -0.35; -0.26 0.849
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Moderate-to-Remarkable Improvement in Global Improvement Assessed by the Investigator
67; 61; 53; 72; 83; 91 0.340
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Score on Interference With Daily Activities Assessed by the Investigator
-0.18; -0.19; -0.07; -0.22; -0.21; -0.20 0.705
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Nasal Symptom Sub-Scores Reported in Participant Diaries
-0.27; -0.32; -0.23; -0.38; -0.40; -0.30 0.175
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Eye Symptom Score Reported in Participant Diaries
-0.28; -0.25; -0.20; -0.31; -0.33; -0.26 0.414

Summary

This is a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of desloratadine (MK-4117) in Japanese participants with perennial allergic rhinitis. The primary hypothesis is that desloratadine is superior to placebo after 2 weeks of treatment with regard to change from baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score among Japanese participants with perennial allergic rhinitis.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosed with perennial allergic rhinitis
  • Outpatient.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Lower respiratory tract infection or nasopharyngolaryngeal infection (acute upper respiratory tract infection, acute pharyngolaryngitis, or acute tonsillitis, etc.)
  • Coexisting infections or systemic mycosis for which there are no effective antibiotics
  • Asthma complication under treatment
  • Nasal septum ulcers, nasal surgery, or nasal trauma, which has not healed
  • Vasomotor rhinitis or eosinophilic rhinitis
  • Nasal conditions (infectious sinusitis, hypertrophic rhinitis, acute or chronic rhinitis, nasal polyps, septal deviation, etc.) which may interfere with the evaluation of the efficacy of the study drug
  • History of hypersensitivity to antihistamines or study drug
  • Currently receiving treatment with another investigational drug or has received an investigational drug in the past 3 months
  • Has started specific desensitization therapy or nonspecific allassotherapy (Histaglobin, vaccine therapy, etc.) or who had discontinued such therapies within 90 days (3 months) before the day of obtaining informed consent
  • Severe hepatic, renal, cardiac, hematological disease, or other serious coexisting diseases and whose general condition is poor
  • History of malignancy or clinically important hematological disorder
  • History of severe drug allergy (e.g., anaphylactoid reaction).
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01918033). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search