N/A
N=57
Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Work Success in Veterans With Mental Illness: A Pre-post Efficacy Study
Mental Disorders · Mental Health Services
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01918774 ↗Enrolled (actual)
57
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Change in Competitive Employment — 13.6 weeks — p=<.001
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Cognitive behavior therapy for work success (CBTw) (Behavioral)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- VA Office of Research and Development
- Primary completion
- Jul 2018
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Change in Competitive Employment |
13.6 | <.001 sig |
| PRIMARY Number of Participants With Steady Competitive Work Attainment |
27 | — |
| SECONDARY Work Effectiveness |
46.9; 88.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) |
57.9; 57.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) |
16.6; 12.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) |
14.1; 12.6 | — |
| SECONDARY Work Related Self-efficacy Scale |
78.7; 81.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Quality of Life Interview |
24.0; 25.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale |
5.7; 5.6 | — |
| SECONDARY Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale |
21.7; 20.1 | — |
| SECONDARY Recovery Assessment Scale |
128.4; 133.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Work Productivity |
19.6; 12.2 | — |
Summary
In 2010, 11.5% of all Gulf War-II Veterans were unemployed; that figure rose to 15.2% in January 2011 and continues to grow as the number of Veterans from recent wars increases. The prevalence of mental illness among Veterans is also notable; estimates range from 31% to nearly 37% for any psychiatric disorder, and over half of these Veterans are diagnosed with more than one psychiatric condition. In addition, empirical evidence suggests that some mental disorders are more prevalent in Veterans than in the general population. Linking unemployment and mental illness, a recent study found that 65% of Veterans using VA healthcare were unemployed, and compared to employed Veterans, the unemployed were more likely to have depression, bipolar disorder, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), schizophrenia, or substance use disorders. Vocational dysfunction was reported most often in disabled Veterans with schizophrenia, PTSD, and substance use disorders. Not surprisingly, this study also found that unemployed Veterans had significantly lower income than employed persons. Similarly, a large study focusing specifically on Veterans with PTSD concluded that vocational dysfunction is a notable problem among this group, as they were significantly less likely to be employed after participating in VA work programs compared with participants without the disorder. Because most individuals with mental illness desire to work in regular competitive employment, the nationwide problem of unemployment among Veterans with mental illness is particularly troubling.
The VA is addressing this need by implementing supported employment (SE), a psychiatric rehabilitation approach that provides individual vocational assistance to Veterans with mental illness. While the SE model is empirically validated and SE programs have been shown to achieve partial success in improving employment outcomes, a sizable proportion of individuals, 40% or more, remain unemployed. A further challenge is job retention; Veterans with mental illness who obtain jobs frequently struggle to maintain them long-term. Even in the context of high quality, evidence-based vocational services, most studies show only modest job retention of a few months, and consequently, frequent job losses and inconsistent vocational functioning remain a substantial and unsolved problem.
Rationale: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) effectively reduces symptoms across a range of psychiatric conditions; however, its benefit to functioning remains less well understood. Work functioning has received little empirical attention in the CBT domain. Despite research evidence suggesting that maladaptive thoughts about oneself and expectations about the ability to work interfere with work success, no CBT programs have been developed specifically targeting vocational themes with the goal of improving competitive work outcomes. Further, a recent paper outlined needed avenues of future study in the SE domain; Drake and Bond (2011) state that cognitive strategies may be a fruitful area to develop to help "nonresponder" consumers with mental illness who struggle with vocational dysfunction despite high quality vocational assistance. The goal of the current project is to address this gap and the serious problem of unemployment in Veterans with mental illness by pilot testing the CBT for work success program (CBTw) and assessing key employment outcomes before and after the intervention, and six months after conclusion of the intervention.
Specific Aims:
Aim 1: Test the preliminary efficacy of the CBTw program on key Veteran employment and psychosocial outcomes utilizing a pre/post design.
Aim 2: Further assess the feasibility of the program, including recruitment, retention rates, and program participation rates.
Aim 3: Gauge effect sizes in preparation for a larger randomized controlled trial examining the effectiveness of the CBT program in routine practice settings
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Participants include Veterans who are receiving individualized vocational services at an urban Midwestern VA medical center.
- Inclusion criteria are a diagnosis of a mental disorder as confirmed through medical record review, current enrollment in vocational services, and an active goal of working in the community
- participants may be currently working in the community or unemployed and searching for work
Exclusion Criteria
- Exclusion criteria is a major cognitive deficit or severe medical condition that would prevent participation in the intervention and/or competitive community work.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01918774). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.