N/A N=37 Randomized Supportive Care

Comparison of Airway Intubation Devices When Using a Biohazard Suit

Intubation; Difficult

Bottom Line

View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01924559 ↗

Enrolled (actual)

Serious AEs

0.0%

Results posted

Mar 2016

Primary outcome: Primary: Time to Successful Intubation — 54; 106.5; 66; 83.5 seconds

Study Design & Population

Study type: Interventional
Phase: N/A
Interventions: standard clothing (Other); Biohazard gear (Other); Direct Laryngoscopy (Device); Glidescope (Device); Supraglottic Airway (Device)
Age: Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex: All
Sponsor: Lehigh Valley Hospital
Primary completion: Sep 2013

Outcome Measures

Outcome	Result	p-value
PRIMARY Time to Successful Intubation	54; 106.5; 66; 83.5; 73.5; 58.5	—

Summary

We will investigate the impact biohazard gear has on time to successful intubation and, in particular, determine how the Supraglottic Airway Laryngopharyngeal Tube (Ecolab, Columbus, Missouri) device compares to traditional direct laryngoscopy and fiber-optic (video) intubation techniques.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Emergency Medicine residents who volunteer to participate and allow their data to be used for research purposes

Exclusion Criteria

Not an Emergency resident who volunteers to participate and allow their data to be used for research purposes

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01924559). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.