Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=102 Randomized Single-blind Other

Saphenous Vein Cannulation in Infants and Small Children

Saphenous Vein Cannulation

Enrolled (actual)
102
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Participants With First Attempt Success of Saphenous Vein Cannulation — 51.0; 90.2 percent of participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Saphenous vein cannulation (Procedure); ultrasound with a linear transducer (L15-7io) (Device); A 22 or 24 G intravenous catheter (Device)
Age
Pediatric
Sex
All
Sponsor
Satoshi Hanada
Primary completion
Jul 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With First Attempt Success of Saphenous Vein Cannulation
51.0; 90.2
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Success of Saphenous Vein Cannulation Within 3 Attempts of Needle Insertion, or a 10 Minute Time Period.
62.8; 92.2
SECONDARY
Time Required for Overall Successful Venous Cannulation.
235; 151

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the two different saphenous vein cannulation techniques; real-time ultrasound image-guided technique (Ultrasound group) vs. traditional landmark technique (Landmark group).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Pediatric patient undergoing scheduled surgery which requires venous cannulation.
  • Term neonates and children /= 3 kg

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient with visible saphenous vein
  • Patient with no detectable saphenous vein under ultrasound
  • Patient with a skin wound or infection around puncture site
  • Patient with recent venous puncture at the puncture site (less than 1 month)
  • Patient with thrombus in saphenous vein or hematoma formation around the vein detected by ultrasound.
  • Patient with any emergency surgery
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01924975). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search