N/A
Completed N=220
Comparison of AccuCath IV Catheter and Conventional IV Catheter in Interventional Radiology
Vascular Access Complications
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01940354 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
220
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2017
Primary outcomePrimary: First Attempt Success Rate With Peripheral IV (PIV) Catheter Placement — 84; 90 Participants
Summary
The study will test a hypothesis that the AccuCath™ System will have a higher rate of successful first attempt peripheral IV placement and higher clinician and patient satisfaction compared to Conventional IV Catheters.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY First Attempt Success Rate With Peripheral IV (PIV) Catheter Placement |
84; 90 | — |
| SECONDARY Patient Satisfaction Upon Successful PIV Placement |
3.88; 4.46 | — |
| SECONDARY Clinician Satisfaction Upon Successful PIV Placement |
3.27; 3.48 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
- Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female, age > or equal to 18 years or 89 years old;
- Requirement for emergent IV placement (patient's condition would be compromised if there is a delay in IV placement);
- Previous venous grafts or surgery at the target vessel access site;
- Currently involved in other investigational clinical trials (unless permission is granted by other study PI).
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01940354). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.