Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=481 Randomized Single-blind Health Services Research

Effectiveness of DECIDE in Patient-Provider Communication, Therapeutic Alliance & Care Continuation

Mental Disorders

Enrolled (actual)
481
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Shared Decision Making (OPTION) Independent Blind Coder Assessment Scores — 36.31; 29.78; 34.50; 30.37 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
DECIDE-PA (Behavioral); DECIDE-PC (Behavioral)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Primary completion
Oct 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Shared Decision Making (OPTION) Independent Blind Coder Assessment Scores
36.31; 29.78; 34.50; 30.37; 32.37; 30.09
PRIMARY
Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 Patient Version)
81.10; 77.5; 75.85; 76.75
PRIMARY
Provider Shared Decision Making in Behavioral Health (SDM -BH) Provider Version
41.26; 40.10; 41.96; 38.41
PRIMARY
Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 Provider Version)
69.03; 69.60; 69.85; 68.46
PRIMARY
Perceptions of Care Survey - Global Evaluation of Care Scale (PoC)
94.60; 91.15; 90.50; 89.00
PRIMARY
Patient Shared Decision Making in Behavioral Health (SDM -BH)- Patient Version
51.46; 47.14; 50.28; 48.67

Summary

The purpose of this study is to learn more about how patients and healthcare providers interact in order to improve shared decision making. The investigators plan to test an intervention with two separate educational components-one for patients and one for providers-designed to encourage patients to ask questions and increase their level of involvement in their own care, while simultaneously training providers to be more receptive to patients' questions and concerns. Patients in the intervention group will receive three short (30-45 minute) trainings focused on developing and asking questions and will be interviewed three times over the course of the intervention to see how it has affected the quality of their care. Providers receiving the intervention will participate in three separate trainings, including a 12-hour group workshop, an additional two hour training, and six hours of individual instruction, including personalized feedback based on three audio-recorded patient visits. Previous studies looking at patient engagement and involvement in decision-making have shown that increased engagement is linked with improved outcomes, but that providers are sometimes not prepared to develop a collaborative relationship with patients. The investigators think that training both patients and providers to work together and communicate more effectively will improve quality of care and increase patient satisfaction more than interventions that focus on only one side of the clinical encounter. One of the major goals in studying patient-provider communication is to improve shared decision-making and see how it contributes to racial and ethnic disparities in mental health care, since minority patients have been shown to be less involved in care and have been shown to be perceived and treated differently by providers.

Eligibility Criteria

Patient Inclusion Criteria: -Patients ages 18-80 who are receiving mental health treatment at one of the collaborating clinics. Patient Exclusion Criteria: -Patients will be excluded if they screen with mania, psychosis, or suicidality to ensure their safety and minimize the stress of receiving the intervention. Patients over the age of 65 will be assessed with a cognitive functioning screening instrument and excluded if possible cognitive impairment is indicated. Provider Inclusion Criteria: -Providers will be permitted to participate in this study if they are regular, paid staff that provide behavioral health services at any of the participating clinics. No other criteria will be required.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01947283). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search