N/A
N=1,805
Effect of Video Monitor Size on Adenoma Detection Rate
Colon Adenoma
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01952418 ↗Enrolled (actual)
1,805
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Adenoma Detection Rate (All Indications) — 264; 271 Participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Monitor size (Device)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 25+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Primary completion
- Dec 2014
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Adenoma Detection Rate (All Indications) |
264; 271 | — |
| PRIMARY Adenoma Detection Rate (Screening Exams Only) |
137; 157 | — |
| SECONDARY Polyp Detection Rate (All Indications) |
367; 424 | — |
| SECONDARY Polyp Detection Rate (Screening Exams Only) |
137; 157 | — |
Summary
The goal of this study is to compare the adenoma detection rate achieved while using either a 24" video monitor or a 32" video monitor.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Physician endoscopist performing colonoscopy at Massachusetts General Hospital GI Endoscopy Unit
- Patients receiving these procedures at Massachusetts General Hospital GI Endoscopy Unit
Exclusion Criteria
- Refusal to participate
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01952418). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.