Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=220 Randomized Single-blind Prevention

Comparison of Three Techniques for Ultrasound-guided Internal Jugular Cannulation

Ultrasound-guided Internal Jugular Cannulation · Central Venous Access Complications

Enrolled (actual)
220
Serious AEs
0.9%
Results posted
Jun 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Cannulation Success — 73; 71; 68 participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Ultrasound-guided Internal jugular venous approach (Procedure)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Mikel Batllori
Primary completion
Mar 2013

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Cannulation Success
73; 71; 68
SECONDARY
Number of Cannulation Attempts
1.92; 1.51; 1.37
SECONDARY
First Attempt Cannulation
39; 51; 53
SECONDARY
Cannulation Time
46.1; 35.0; 41.2
SECONDARY
Mechanical Complications
3; 11; 5
SECONDARY
Infectious Complications
2; 0; 0

Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of three ultrasound assistance techniques for internal jugular venous cannulation, in terms of cannulation success and prevention of complications.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients aged 18 or older
  • Indication for internal jugular venous cannulation, previously established by the doctor responsible for the patient´s hospital diagnosis and treatment
  • Informed consent for trial participation has been obtained from the patient

Exclusion Criteria

  • Infection signs at or close to puncture site
  • Cutaneous erosions or subcutaneous haematoma at or close to puncture site
  • History of internal jugular venous cannulation during the past 72 hours (in the same side in which the present cannulation is taking place)
  • History of previous surgical interventions on the cannulation site
  • Recent cervical trauma with present neck immobilization and without having ruled out eventual cervical spinal injury
  • Severe coagulopathy (altered coagulation parameters and active bleeding) which cannot be promptly corrected by platelet, fresh frozen plasma or pharmacologic intervention
  • Subcutaneous emphysema with cervical extension
  • Agitated or uncooperative patient (including deep sedation)
  • Inability to obtain formal informed consent from the patient or his legally authorized representative (in case the patient is legally incompetent to give informed consent)
  • Cannulation being performed outside the surgical area or the post-anesthesia care unit
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01966354). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search