Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=14,965

Lansoprazole Tablets Special Drug Use Surveillance Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease With Dyspepsia Symptoms

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease With Dyspepsia Symptoms

Enrolled (actual)
14,965
Serious AEs
0.1%
Results posted
Nov 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Subjective Symptom Improvement Rate — 75.7; 73.5; 68.6; 65.3 percentage of participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Lansoprazole (Drug)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
Sex
All
Sponsor
Takeda
Primary completion
Dec 2010

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Subjective Symptom Improvement Rate
75.7; 73.5; 68.6; 65.3; 69.1; 73.0
SECONDARY
Frequency of Adverse Events (Adverse Drug Reactions)
0.69; 0.16; 0.08; 0.07; 0.04; 0.04

Summary

To evaluate the efficacy of 4-week lansoprazole (Takepron) therapy for subjective symptomatic improvement in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with dyspepsia symptoms

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with heartburn or acid regurgitation at the start of Takepron administration* , or patients without heartburn and acid regurgitation, but with endoscopic findings classified as Los Angeles grade A-D at the start of Takepron therapy.
  • Patients with symptoms of dyspepsia (i.e., postprandial fullness, early satiation, epigastric pain, epigastric burning, upper abdominal bloating, nausea/vomiting, or belching) at the start of Takepron administration* *These patients must have answered "never, " "sometimes/mild," "often/moderate," or "frequent/severe" on a 4-point scale questionnaire about subjective symptoms.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients who have taken any proton pump inhibitors (including Takepron) within 4 weeks before the start of Takepron administration
  • Patients taking antidepressants
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01990339). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search