Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=161 Treatment

CEP249 Pediatric Accuracy Study

Insulin Requiring Diabetes
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01991470 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
161
Serious AEs
0.9%
Results posted
Sep 2018
Primary outcomePrimary: Enlite Sensor Accuracy Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), With Lower Serial Number 530G Pump — 15.02 percentage of difference

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Enlite Sensor™ and Enlite 3 Sensor performance in pediatric patients with insulin requiring diabetes at the beginning, middle and end of sensor wear.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Enlite Sensor Accuracy Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), With Lower Serial Number 530G Pump
15.02 —
PRIMARY
Enlite 3 Sensor Accuracy Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), With the Guardian Mobile System
10.88 —
SECONDARY
Enlite 3 Sensor Accuracy Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), With the GST3C Transmitter
11.08 —
SECONDARY
Enlite Sensor Accuracy Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), With Higher Serial Number 530G Pump
17.50 —
SECONDARY
Enlite Sensor Accuracy Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), With Lower Serial Number 530G Pump, Using One Additional Calibration During FST
14.37 —
SECONDARY
Enlite Sensor Accuracy Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), With Higher Serial Number 530G Pump, Using One Additional Calibration During FST
16.94 —
SECONDARY
Enlite 3 Sensor Accuracy Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), With the Guardian Mobile System, Using One Additional Calibration During FST
10.05 —
SECONDARY
Enlite 3 Sensor Accuracy Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), With GST3C Transmitter, Using One Additional Calibration During FST
10.85 —

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subject is 2-18 years of age at time of screening
  • Subject has been diagnosed with insulin requiring diabetes mellitus for at least one year.
  • Subject is willing to perform greater than or equal to 4 finger stick blood glucose measurements daily
  • Subject is willing to perform required sensor calibrations
  • Subject is willing to wear the system (Guardian Mobile application, pumps, sensors, meter) continuously throughout the study
  • Adequate venous access as assessed by investigator or appropriate staff

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subject is unable to tolerate tape adhesive in the area of sensor placement
  • Subject has any unresolved adverse skin condition in the area of sensor or device placement (e.g., psoriasis, rash, Staphylococcus infection)
  • Subject is actively participating in an investigational study (drug or device) wherein they have received treatment from an investigational study (drug or device) in the last 2 weeks
  • Females of child-bearing potential who have a positive pregnancy test at screening or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study
  • Subjects with hematocrit lower than the normal age specific reference range per central or local lab testing
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01991470). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search