Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=300 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Comparative Effectiveness of Pregnancy Failure Management Regimens

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02012491 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
300
Serious AEs
2.7%
Results posted
Dec 2018
Primary outcomePrimary: Gestational Sac Expulsion With One Treatment Dose on Day 3 (Visit 2) and no Need for Additional Medical or Surgical Intervention Within 30 Days of Treatment. — 100; 124 Participants
◆ Published Evidence
Established
47citations · ~8 / year
Management of early pregnancy loss with mifepristone and misoprostol: clinical predictors of treatment success from a randomized trial.
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2020 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the effectiveness of combination treatment (mifepristone premedication plus single-dose misoprostol) to single-dose misoprostol (standard of care) for the management of early pregnancy failure.

Linked Publications (5)

  • Management of early pregnancy loss with mifepristone and misoprostol: clinical predictors of treatment success from a randomized trial.
    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2020 · 47 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Racial Disparities in Mental Health Outcomes Among Women With Early Pregnancy Loss.
    Obstetrics and gynecology · 2021 · 38 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Cost-effectiveness of Mifepristone Pretreatment for the Medical Management of Nonviable Early Pregnancy: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    JAMA network open · 2020 · 28 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Medical management of early pregnancy loss is cost-effective compared with office uterine aspiration.
    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2022 · 6 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • The effect of mifepristone pretreatment on bleeding and pain during medical management of early pregnancy loss.
    Contraception · 2021 · 4 citations · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Gestational Sac Expulsion With One Treatment Dose on Day 3 (Visit 2) and no Need for Additional Medical or Surgical Intervention Within 30 Days of Treatment.
100; 124
PRIMARY
Gestational Sac Expulsion by the Second Follow-up Visit at Day 8
111; 132
PRIMARY
Gestational Sac Expulsion by the 30-day Telephone Call
113; 135
PRIMARY
Uterine Asperation
35; 13
SECONDARY
Frequency of Serious Adverse Events Between Study Arms.
3; 5
SECONDARY
Adverse Event Reported by Participants
5.6; 6.1

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • between 5 and 12 completed weeks gestation
  • 18 years or older
  • hemodynamically stable
  • confirmed diagnosis of intrauterine embryonic/fetal demise or anembryonic gestation (ultrasound examination demonstrates a fetal pole without cardiac activity measuring between 5.3 and 40 mm or an abnormal growth pattern diagnostic of early pregnancy failure)
  • willing and able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • diagnosis of incomplete or inevitable abortion (absent gestational sac and/or active bleeding, open cervical os)
  • contraindication to mifepristone (chronic corticosteroid administration, adrenal disease)
  • contraindication to misoprostol (glaucoma, mitral stenosis, sickle cell anemia, or known allergy to prostaglandin)
  • cardiovascular disease (angina, valvular disease, arrhythmia, or cardiac failure)
  • most recent hemoglobin <9.5 g/dL
  • diagnosis of porphyria
  • known clotting defect or receiving anticoagulants
  • pregnancy with an intrauterine device (IUD) in place
  • breastfeeding during the first 7 days of study participation
  • unwilling to comply with the study protocol and visit schedule
  • any evidence of viable pregnancy
  • possibility of ectopic pregnancy
  • known or suspected pelvic infection
  • concurrent participation in any other interventional trial
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02012491) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search