Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=200 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Social Forces to Improve Statin Adherence (Study A)

Medication Adherence · High Blood Pressure · Diabetes

Enrolled (actual)
200
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Statin Adherence — 86; 85; 86; 85 percentage of correct statin doses

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Medication Adherence Partner (Behavioral); Electronic pill bottle (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Primary completion
Oct 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Statin Adherence
86; 85; 86; 85
SECONDARY
Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS)
5.38; 6; 5.75; 5.75

Summary

To assess the effectiveness of reporting statin adherence patterns to a Medication Adherence Partner (MAP) in improving the outcome of statin adherence versus usual care as measured by an electronic pill bottle. Hypothesis: Subjects with a MAP receiving daily adherence feedback will have the highest statin adherence of any arm, as measured by pill bottle data.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • The subject is Humana insured
  • The subject is an English speaking adult
  • Age range ≥18 years
  • The subject has diagnosis with diabetes for ≥12 months
  • The subject has an MPR <70% to a statin medication
  • Subject denies side-effects to their statin medication
  • The subject identified a person who agreed to serve as their MAP

Exclusion Criteria

  • The subject is <18 years old
  • The subject is considered part of a vulnerable population (is a prisoner, a cognitively impaired person, or a pregnant woman)
  • On statin combination medication
  • The subject does not identify an individual who agrees to serve as their MAP
  • The subject reports a clinically important side effect to the statin medication or active liver disease:
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02018809). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search