Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=306 Randomized Health Services Research

Pharmacists and Pharmacy Technicians to Improve Admission Medication History Accuracy

Adverse Drug Events
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02026453 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
306
Serious AEs
Results posted
Oct 2017
Primary outcomePrimary: Mean Severity-weighted Admission Medication History (AMH) Error Score — 23; 4.1; 4.1 Mean Severity-weighted AMH Error Score

Summary

We tested two interventions to improve the accuracy of medication histories obtained at hospital admission. The interventions target elderly and chronically ill patients prone to erroneous medication histories and resultant medication errors. For targeted patients, we tested the effect of using pharmacists and pharmacy technicians to obtain an initial medication history. This was studied using a randomized controlled trial of usual care (which involves nurses and physicians) vs usual care + pharmacists vs usual care + pharmacy technicians to obtain an admission medication history. The overarching hypothesis was that by leveraging pharmacists and pharmacy technicians we can minimize admission medication history errors and related downstream events.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Severity-weighted Admission Medication History (AMH) Error Score
23; 4.1; 4.1
SECONDARY
Mean Severity-Weighted Admission Medication Order (AMO) Error Score
6.9; 1.5; 1.2

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Accessed via EHR, were: >=10 chronic prescription medications
  • History of acute myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure
  • Admission from skilled nursing facility
  • History of transplant, or active anticoagulant, insulin, or narrow therapeutic index medications.

Exclusion criteria:(supersedes inclusion criteria)

  • Admitted to pediatric, trauma or transplant services with pharmacists
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02026453). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search