Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=263 Randomized Treatment

Home Based Care Transitions Tailored by Cognition and Patient Activation

Chronic Disease

Enrolled (actual)
263
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Health Care Utilization — 7; 8; 4; 3 events

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Grp 1a Low Cognition, Low Activation Intervention (Behavioral); Grp 2a Low Cognition, High Activation Intervention (Behavioral); Grp 3a Normal Cognition, Low Activation Intervention (Behavioral); Grp 4a Normal Cognition, High Activation Intervention (Behavioral)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 19+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Nebraska
Primary completion
Dec 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Health Care Utilization
7; 8; 4; 3; 5; 13
SECONDARY
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Pain Interference
58.8; 57.0; 61.4; 54.2; 56.0; 55.4 0.463
SECONDARY
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Functioning
39.1; 42.1; 36.3; 43.6; 41.1; 43.8 0.532
SECONDARY
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Satisfaction With Social Roles
49.3; 49.2; 43.8; 50.4; 44.1; 50.4 0.153
SECONDARY
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System- Anxiety
54.0; 51.0; 53.5; 46.6; 51.3; 46.8 0.521
SECONDARY
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Fatigue
54.8; 54.3; 56.7; 50.5; 55.9; 49.3 0.776
SECONDARY
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System- Depression
55.2; 50.5; 54.4; 49.4; 52.6; 47.4 0.564
SECONDARY
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Sleep Deprivation
50.1; 51.5; 53.5; 48.4; 50.5; 46.9 0.917
SECONDARY
Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care
2.9; 2.9; 2.5; 3.0; 2.8; 3.2 0.872
SECONDARY
Health Related Quality of Life EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D)
0.68; 0.76; 0.65; 0.80; 0.72; 0.77 0.627
SECONDARY
EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
68.2; 67.2; 62.4; 73.5; 61.3; 79.0 .436

Summary

There is overwhelming evidence that patients with multiple chronic illnesses need better self-management skills. Discharge from the hospital may not be the most opportune time to be teaching patients these self-management skills. There are several different care transition models being used across the country; however we know that not every patient needs the same type or amount of an intervention. The purpose of this pilot study is to study the impact delivering a home based care transitions intervention (HBCTI) with four different groups tailored on cognition and level of patient activation compared to usual care (UC) resulting in 8 study arms on the outcomes of health care utilization (HCU) and health outcomes: patient-reported health status, assessment of care for chronic conditions, and health related quality of life in adult patients with multiple chronic diseases dismissed to home from an acute care facility. Our working hypothesis is that patients in the HBCTI groups compared to the UC groups will have lower HCU and improved outcomes (patient-reported health status, assessment of care for chronic conditions, and health related quality of life).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult Patients (age 19 and older) being discharged from the hospital with three or more chronic diseases;
  • Have a score greater than 17 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (dementia);
  • Reside within a 35 mile radius of Lincoln, Ne.; and
  • Able to hear, speak and read English.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients will be excluded if they:

  • have a terminal illness;
  • have a score of less than 17 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (dementia);
  • are under the care of The Physicians Network (TPN) at St. Elizabeth Regional Medical Center (SERMC).
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02045147). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search