Study of Intrathecal Idursulfase-IT Administered in Conjunction With Elaprase® in Pediatric Patients With Hunter Syndrome and Early Cognitive Impairment
Hunter Syndrome
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02055118 ↗Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Interventions
- idursulfase-IT (Biological); No IT treatment (Other)
- Age
- Pediatric, Adult
- Sex
- Male
- Sponsor
- Shire
- Primary completion
- Sep 2017
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Change From Baseline in the Differential Ability Scales, Second Edition (DAS-II) General Conceptual Ability (GCA) Standard Score at Week 52 |
-7.4; -4.4 | 0.5669 |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) Adaptive Behavior Composite (ABC) Score at Week 52 |
-5.3; -5.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in the Differential Ability Scales, Second Edition (DAS-II) General Conceptual Ability (GCA) Standard Score at Weeks 16, 28 and 40 |
-2.9; -0.6; -6.1; -0.3; -6.4; -3.2 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) Adaptive Behavior Composite (ABC) Score at Week 16, 28 and 40 |
-2.8; -3.1; -1.1; -1.8; -3.3; -4.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in Differential Ability Scales, Second Edition (DAS-II) Cluster Standard Scores at Weeks 16, 28, 40 and 52 |
-1.1; -6.9; -6.7; 2.6; -5.6; 1.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) Standard Scores of Other Domains at Weeks 16, 28, 40, 52 |
-2.8; -1.7; -3.5; -3.5; -4.0; -2.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline of Age Equivalent Score for Early Years of Core Subtests of the Differential Ability Scales, Second Edition (DAS-II) at Weeks 16, 28, 40 and 52 |
0.05; 0.03; 0.00; 0.48; 0.18; -0.02 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline of Age Equivalents for School Age of Core Subtests of the Differential Ability Scales, Second Edition (DAS-II) at Weeks 16, 28, 40 and 52 |
-1.75; 1.00; 1.50; 0.25; 1.00; -0.13 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline of Development Quotients for Early Years of Core Subtests of the Differential Ability Scales, Second Edition (DAS-II) at Weeks 16, 28, 40 and 52 |
-5.91; -4.71; -4.91; 3.41; -2.09; -5.44 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline of Development Quotients for School Age of Core Subtests of the Differential Ability Scales, Second Edition (DAS-II) at Weeks 16, 28, 40 and 52 |
-15.10; 9.20; 9.60; 0.00; 5.70; -4.85 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline of T-scores for Early Years of Core Subtests of the Differential Ability Scale, Second Edition (DAS-II) at Weeks 16, 28, 40 and 52 |
-1.7; -3.6; -2.3; 2.1; -0.1; -2.4 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline of T-scores for School Age of Core Subtests of the Differential Ability Scale, Second Edition (DAS-II) at Weeks 16, 28, 40 and 52 |
-10.0; 5.0; 7.0; -0.5; 3.0; -2.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline of Age Equivalents Scores of Sub-domains of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) at Weeks 16, 28, 40 and 52 |
0.09; 0.12; -0.09; -0.32; 0.08; 0.02 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline of Development Quotients of Sub-domains of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) at Weeks 16, 28, 40 and 52 |
-1.09; -2.57; -2.58; -8.19; -4.10; -5.62 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline of V-Scale Scores of Sub-domains of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) at Weeks 16, 28, 40 and 52 |
-0.1; -0.4; -0.3; -0.7; -0.7; -1.1 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline of V-Scale Scores of Maladaptive Behavior Index and Its Sub-scales at Weeks 16, 28, 40 and 52 |
0.3; -0.2; 0.1; -0.3; 0.5; 0.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Observed Maladaptive Levels of Maladaptive Behavior Index and Its Sub-scales of Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) |
7; 8; 5; 20; 2; 5 | — |
| SECONDARY Maximum Observed Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Idursulfase After IT Administration |
253.44; 132.87; 136.15 | — |
| SECONDARY Time to Reach Maximum Drug Concentration (Tmax) of Idursulfase After IT Administration |
10.07; 10.37; 10.18 | — |
| SECONDARY Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Zero From the Time of Dosing to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) of Idursulfase After IT Administration |
2601; 2949; 2863 | — |
| SECONDARY Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Idursulfase After IT Administration |
11.39; 10.68; 11.52 | — |
| SECONDARY Total Body Clearance for Extravascular Administration Divided by the Fraction of Dose Absorbed (CL/F) of Idursulfase After IT Administration |
4.82; 4.54; 3.94 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in the Concentration of Glycosaminoglycans (GAG) in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) at Week 52 |
-124.6; -961.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Concentration of Idursulfase in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) |
0; 552.75; 520.29; 176.87; 146.66; 268.72 | — |
| SECONDARY Participant Response to Quality of Life EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Questionnaire at Week 52 |
9; 22; 4; 7; 1; 1 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Intrathecal Drug Delivery Device (IDDD)-Related Adverse Events |
14; 33; 0; 22 | — |
| SECONDARY Composite Scores of Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-III) Scale in Substudy Population |
97; 82; 67; 94; 79; 82 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentile Scores of Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-III) Scale in Substudy Population |
42; 12; 1; 34; 8; 12 | — |
| SECONDARY Age Equivalent Scores of Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-III) Scale in Substudy Population |
28; 24; 28; 20; 18; 21 | — |
| SECONDARY Chronological Age of Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-III) Scale in Substudy Population |
29.31; 29.31; 32.92; 32.92; 35.91; 35.91 | — |
| SECONDARY Development Quotient (DQ) of Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-III) Scale in Substudy Population |
95.5; 81.9; 85.1; 60.8; 50.1; 58.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Raw Scores of Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-III) Scale in Substudy Population |
42; 57; 42; 54; 34; 55 | — |
Summary
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria Inclusion Criteria for the Pivotal Study
Patients must meet all of the following criteria to be considered eligible for randomization in the pivotal study:
- The patient is male and is ≥3 and 85, there must be evidence of a decrease in GCA score of ≥10 points over 12 months from a previously documented test result in observational study HGT-HIT-090.
A patient who is ≥13 and <18 years of age must have both of the following criteria (3c AND 3d):
- A GCA score of ≥55 and ≤85. AND
- There must be evidence of a decrease in GCA score of ≥10 points over 12 months from a previously documented
- The patient has received and tolerated a minimum of 4 months of therapy with Elaprase during the period immediately prior to Screening.
- The patient must have sufficient auditory capacity, with a hearing aid(s), if needed, in the Investigator's judgment to complete the required protocol testing and must be compliant with wearing the hearing aid(s), if needed, on scheduled testing days.
- The patient's parent(s) or legally authorized guardian(s) must have voluntarily signed an Institutional Review Board/Independent Ethics Committee approved informed consent form after all relevant aspects of the study have been explained and discussed. Consent of the patient's parent(s) or legally authorized guardian(s) and the patient's assent, if applicable, must be obtained prior to the start of any study procedures.
Inclusion Criteria for the Substudy
Patients must meet all of the following criteria to be considered eligible for enrollment in the separate substudy:
- The patient is male and is <3 years of age at the time of informed consent.
- The patient must have a documented diagnosis of MPS II.
- The patient has evidence at Screening of Hunter syndrome-related cognitive impairment
- The patient has received and tolerated a minimum of 4 months of therapy with Elaprase during the period immediately prior to Screening.
- The patient must have sufficient auditory capacity, with a hearing aid(s), if needed, in the Investigator's judgment to complete the required protocol testing and must be compliant with wearing the hearing aid(s), if needed, on scheduled testing days.
- The patient's parent(s) or legally authorized guardian(s) must have voluntarily signed an Institutional Review Board/Independent Ethics Committee approved informed consent form after all relevant aspects of the study have been explained and discussed. Consent of the patient's parent(s) or legally authorized guardian(s) must be obtained prior to the start of any study procedures.
Exclusion Criteria
Patients who meet any of the following criteria are not eligible to be randomized into the pivotal study or enrolled in the separate substudy:
- The patient has clinically significant non-Hunter syndrome-related CNS involvement (such as Fragile-X syndrome) which is judged by the Investigator to be likely to interfere with the accurate administration and interpretation of protocol assessments.
- The patient has a large chromosomal deletion or complex rearrangement that includes a deletion of the FMR1 and/or FMR2 genes.
- The patient has a significant medical or psychiatric comorbidity(ies) that might affect study data or confound the integrity of study results.
- The patient has contra-indications for performance of lumbar puncture such as musculoskeletal/spinal abnormalities or risk of abnormal bleeding.
- The patient has a history of complications from previous lumbar punctures or technical challenges in conducting lumbar punctures such that the potential risks would exceed possible benefits for the patient.
- The patient has an opening CSF pressure upon lumbar puncture that exceeds 30.0 cm H2O.
- The patient has experienced infusion-related anaphylactoid event(s) or has evidence of consistent severe adverse events related to treatment with Elaprase which, in the Investigator's opinion, may pose an unnecessary risk to the patient.
- The patient has
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02055118). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.