N/A N=90 Randomized Treatment

Ureteral Stents Versus Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Initial Urinary Drainage

Children · Obstructive Uropathy · Acute Renal Failure · Ureteric Stones

Bottom Line

View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02055430 ↗

Enrolled (actual)

Serious AEs

0.0%

Results posted

Apr 2014

Primary outcome: Primary: Period to Return to Normal Creatinine — 2.22; 2.18 days

Study Design & Population

Study type: Interventional
Phase: N/A
Interventions: percutaneous nephrostomy insertion (Procedure); bilateral double J ureteric stent (Procedure); Definitive stone management (Procedure)
Age: Pediatric
Sex: All
Sponsor: Cairo University
Primary completion: Mar 2013

Outcome Measures

Outcome	Result	p-value
PRIMARY Period to Return to Normal Creatinine	2.22; 2.18	—
PRIMARY Complications of Each Drainage Method	—	—
SECONDARY The Number of Subsequent Interventions Needed for Clearance of Stones .	—	—

Summary

To compare percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) versus double J stent (JJ) as an initial urinary drainage in children

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

children ≤12 years old presenting with Obstructive Anuria and Acute Renal Failure due to bilateral ureteric stones

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with grade 0-1 hydronephrosis
fever, pyonephrosis or sepsis.
any contraindication to both methods of drainage (urinary diversion, urethral stricture or uncontrolled coagulopathy).

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02055430). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.