Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=90 Randomized Treatment

Ureteral Stents Versus Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Initial Urinary Drainage

Children · Obstructive Uropathy · Acute Renal Failure · Ureteric Stones
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02055430 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
90
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2014
Primary outcomePrimary: Period to Return to Normal Creatinine — 2.22; 2.18 days

Summary

To compare percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) versus double J stent (JJ) as an initial urinary drainage in children

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Period to Return to Normal Creatinine
2.22; 2.18
PRIMARY
Complications of Each Drainage Method
SECONDARY
The Number of Subsequent Interventions Needed for Clearance of Stones .

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • children ≤12 years old presenting with Obstructive Anuria and Acute Renal Failure due to bilateral ureteric stones

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with grade 0-1 hydronephrosis
  • fever, pyonephrosis or sepsis.
  • any contraindication to both methods of drainage (urinary diversion, urethral stricture or uncontrolled coagulopathy).
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02055430). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search