Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=82 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Lutonix® Drug Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis

Femoral Artery Stenosis · Femoral Artery Occlusion · Restenosis

Enrolled (actual)
82
Serious AEs
74.4%
Results posted
May 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Participants With Primary Patency at 1 Year — 67.0; 49.5 Percentage of Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Lutonix DCB (Device); Standard Uncoated Balloon Angioplasty Catheter (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
C. R. Bard
Primary completion
Feb 2017

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With Primary Patency at 1 Year
67.0; 49.5
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Without Primary Safety Events
72.8; 64.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Device Success
98.1; 100
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Technical Success
66.0; 77.8
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success
70.0; 77.8
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Primary Patency at 6 and 12 Months
92.1; 77.0; 67.0; 37.1
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Secondary Patency at 6 Months and 12 Months
90.9; 60.0; 74.2; 80.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Without Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
94.3; 96.4; 78.6; 64.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Without Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
94.3; 92.7; 78.6; 64.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Benefit Compared to Baseline
69.4; 59.1; 61.2; 50.0
SECONDARY
Change of Rutherford Classification From Baseline
-1.7; -1.5; -1.6; -1.9
SECONDARY
Change of Resting Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) From Baseline
0.20; 0.25; 0.16; 0.16
SECONDARY
Change in Walking Impairment Questionnaire From Baseline
14.9; 16.0; 12.7; 12.7
SECONDARY
Change in Quality of Life From Baseline
0.1; 0.0; 0.0; 0.0; -2.0; 0.3
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Without Major Vascular Complications (≤30 Day)
98.1; 92.9
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Without All-Cause Death
100; 100; 100; 96.4; 100; 96.4
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Without Major Limb Amputation
100; 100; 100; 100; 100; 100
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Without Minor Limb Amputation
100; 100; 100; 96.4; 100; 96.4
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Without Target Vessel Revascularizations (TVR)
96.2; 100; 90.5; 92.7; 76.7; 64.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Without Any Target Limb Reinterventions
96.2; 100; 88.5; 92.7; 72.8; 64.0

Summary

To assess the safety and efficacy of the Lutonix Drug Coated Balloon for treatment of femoropopliteal artery (SFA) in-stent restenosis (ISR).

Eligibility Criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria

  • Male or non-pregnant female ≥18 years of age
  • Rutherford Clinical Category 2-4
  • Significant (≥ 50%) restenosis of a previous bare (not covered and not drug-eluting) nitinol stent(s) in the femoropopliteal artery
  • Lesion measures between 4 and 18 cm
  • Target vessel diameter between ≥4 and ≤6 mm and able to be treated with available device size matrix
  • A patent inflow artery free from significant lesion (≥50% stenosis) as confirmed by angiography
  • Successful crossing and predilatation of the target lesion with a guidewire
  • At least one patent native outflow artery to the ankle, free from significant (≥50%) stenosis as confirmed by angiography that has not previously been (nor planned to be) revascularized
  • No other prior vascular or surgical interventions within 2 weeks before and/or planned 30 days after the protocol treatment

Key Exclusion Criteria

  • Life expectancy of 50 % stenosis of distal popliteal and/or all three tibial vessels), or planned future treatment of vascular disease distal to the target lesion
  • Intended use of adjunctive treatment modalities (i.e. laser, atherectomy, cryoplasty, scoring/cutting balloon, stents, etc.)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02063672). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search