Phase 2
Completed N=236
Efficacy and Safety Study of 2 Different Concentrations of CD1579 Gels Versus Vehicle in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02073461 ↗Enrolled (actual)
236
Serious AEs
0.4%
Results posted
Nov 2016
Primary outcomePrimary: Percent Changes From Baseline in Total Lesion Counts — 58.3; 65.9; 25.5 percent change
Summary
This study is to assess the efficacy and safety of two concentrations of CD1579 (2.5% and 5%) versus vehicle in the treatment of acne vulgaris in the Japanese patients.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Percent Changes From Baseline in Total Lesion Counts |
58.3; 65.9; 25.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Percent of Subjects With Adverse Events |
43.0; 39.7; 32.9; 12.7; 14.1; 13.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Local Tolerability (Erythema) |
12; 18; 5; 3; 3; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Local Tolerability (Scaling) |
15; 25; 8; 4; 7; 1 | — |
| SECONDARY Local Tolerability (Dryness) |
20; 33; 10; 2; 6; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Local Tolerability (Pruritus) |
20; 13; 6; 6; 7; 1 | — |
| SECONDARY Local Tolerability (Stinging/Burning) |
19; 29; 4; 6; 7; 1 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Men and women at the age of 12 or older at the Screening visit.
- Those with clinical diagnosis of acne vulgaris with more than 20 noninflammatory lesions (open and closed comedones) and 12 to 100 (inclusive) inflammatory lesions (papules, pustules and nodules) on the face (forehead, both cheeks, nose and chin).
Exclusion Criteria
- Those with more than two nodular acne lesions or any cysts.
- Those with the diagnosis of any acne conglobata, any acne fulminans, any chloracne, or any drug induced acne.
- Those who have clinically significant abnormal findings or conditions on skin other than acne such as atopic dermatitis, perioral dermatitis, or rosacea that potentially interfere with study assessments according to Investigator's judgment
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02073461). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.