Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=265 Randomized Prevention

Physician Radiation Exposure During Radial Access Cardiac Catheterization Using a RAD Board

Radiation Exposure to Operator

Enrolled (actual)
265
Serious AEs
Results posted
Oct 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Operator Radiation Exposure — .65; .56 mSv

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Board (Device); No Board (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Geisinger Clinic
Primary completion
Oct 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Operator Radiation Exposure
.65; .56
SECONDARY
Radiation Exposure to Operator During Diagnostic Catheterization With Versus Without Ventriculography/Aortography
.65; .61; .66; .54

Summary

Radiation exposure to operator is an occupational hazard of invasive cardiologists. During radial access for diagnostic catheterization, a new radio-dense arm board is advertised to reduce operator radiation exposure. The investigators randomize patients to a new radio-dense armboard versus a standard radio-transparent armboard during diagnostic catheterization and measure radiation exposure to the operator. Both groups have a radio-dense pelvic shield in place. The investigators hypothesize that operator radiation dose will be decreased by use of the radio-dense armboard.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Operators: Interventional or diagnostic interventional attendings and fellows, operators willing to participate.

Patients: Age 18-89 years old requiring catheterization at Geisinger Medical Center using radial access

Exclusion Criteria

  • patients with CABG, requiring extensive imaging, with operator switch during the procedure
  • patients in whom the procedure took unusual time because of anatomic issues, and need to switch to alternative access.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02088788). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search