Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=138 Diagnostic

Non-Endoscopic Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus Following Ablative Therapy

Barrett's Esophagus

Enrolled (actual)
138
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Cytosponge Acceptability by Number of Participants — 46; 81; 2; 6 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Cytosponge (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Primary completion
Aug 2018

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Cytosponge Acceptability by Number of Participants
46; 81; 2; 6; 0; 1
PRIMARY
Mean Post Procedure Pain on the Visual Analog Scale
19.1; 17.0
PRIMARY
Willingness to Repeat Cytosponge by Number of Participants
44; 86; 3; 2
PRIMARY
Mean Procedure Preference Rating
7.8; 7.9; 9.2; 9.1
SECONDARY
Cytosponge™ Operating Characteristics
92.00; 85.00; 80.00; 74.00; NA; 84.00

Summary

Subjects presenting to University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Hospitals for routine endoscopic surveillance examinations for current Barrett's Esophagus (BE) or after successful radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus (BE) will be offered enrollment in the study. After informed consent, and the same day as the endoscopic procedure, the subject will undergo administration of the Cytosponge assay. The patient will then undergo routine endoscopic surveillance, using a standard Seattle biopsy surveillance protocol. The Cytosponge will be placed in fixative and shipped to the Fitzgerald laboratory at the University of Cambridge for processing according to their established protocols. Tissue biopsies will undergo standard processing and Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining, with assessment by expert gastrointestinal pathologists at UNC. The primary outcome variables will be sensitivity and specificity of the novel assay, compared against the gold standard of the presence of recurrent BE as detected by upper endoscopy with biopsies. Secondary outcomes include acceptability of the nonendoscopic assay to the patient (assessed by a standardized tool, the Impact of Events Scale, as well as a visual analogue scale), and likelihood of assay positivity as a function of amount of residual disease (as measured by Prague criteria).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male or female subjects, age 18-80 years,
  • Meets the following:

2.1. Previous diagnosis of Barrett's Esophagus (BE) with dysplastic low grade dysplasia (LGD) or high grade dysplasia (HGD), as evidenced by both classical endoscopic appearance of salmon-colored mucosa in the tubular esophagus, as well as endoscopic biopsies from the involved areas demonstrating columnar metaplasia with goblet cells. The diagnosis of dysplasia must have been confirmed by a second expert pathologist. Previous endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of focal nodular high grade dysplasia (HGD) or superficial intramucosal cancer (IMC) is allowable, as long as the EMR specimen shows complete resection of any IMC with clear margins, and biopsies following ablation confirm excision of the lesion, AND 2.1.1. A history of complete eradication of both dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia by radiofrequency ablation. Complete eradication is defined as a normal endoscopic appearance of the tubular esophagus, and histologic confirmation by biopsies in 4 quadrants every cm from throughout the length of the previous BE (post-RFA cohort).OR 2.2. Current diagnosis of BE, presenting for routine care endoscopy (BE cohort).

  • Good general health, with no severely debilitating diseases, active malignancy, or condition that would interfere with study participation.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Current use of blood thinners such as coumadin, warfarin, clopidogrel, heparin and/or low molecular weight heparin (requires discontinuation of medication 5 days prior to and 7 days after esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and Cytosponge administration, aspirin use is OK).
  • Known bleeding disorder
  • For the post-RFA cohort, prior ablative therapy of the esophagus other than radiofrequency ablation (RFA), including photodynamic therapy (PDT), more than one session of spray cryotherapy, and any other ablation therapies is exclusionary. However, prior endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is acceptable and up to two prior treatments of thermal/coagulation therapy (other than RFA) for focal residual disease following otherwise successful RFA therapy is acceptable.
  • History of esophageal stricture precluding passage of the endoscope or sponge,
  • Pregnancy, or planned pregnancy during the course of the study,
  • Any history of esophageal varices, liver impairment of moderate or worse severity (Child's- Pugh class B & C) or evidence of varices noted on any past endoscopy,
  • Any history of esophageal surgery, except for uncomplicated fundoplication, and,
  • History of coagulopathy, with international normalized ratio (INR) >1.3 and/or platelet count of <75,000.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02106910). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search