Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=38 Randomized Health Services Research

Evaluation of Videoconferencing Versus Telephone Genetic Counseling

Remote Consultation, Teleconsultation · Remote Consultation, Video

Enrolled (actual)
38
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Assessment of Knowledge Retention of Genetic Counseling Information Via 8-Question Pre- and Post-Counseling Assessment — 5.63; 4.37; 6.50; 4.74 Number of correct answers (out of 8)

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Videoconferencing Genetic Consultation (Other); Teleconferencing Genetic Consultation (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 50+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Primary completion
Mar 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Assessment of Knowledge Retention of Genetic Counseling Information Via 8-Question Pre- and Post-Counseling Assessment
5.63; 4.37; 6.50; 4.74
PRIMARY
Satisfaction With Genetic Counseling Session Using the Genetic Counseling Satisfaction Scale
26.88; 25.21
PRIMARY
Qualitative Assessment of Genetic Counseling Experience, Barriers and Facilitators by PATIENTS
NA; NA
PRIMARY
Qualitative Assessment of Genetic Counseling Experience, Barriers and Facilitators by GENETIC COUNSELORS
NA; NA
PRIMARY
Cost Analysis
67.29

Summary

Genetic counseling has benefits for individuals and their family members in their health care decision-making. Provision of genetic counseling has been deemed standard of care by several medical organizations and incorporated into clinical guidelines, such as those of the US Preventive Services Task Force. To better comply with these guidelines, Genomic Medicine Service (GMS) recently established at the Salt Lake City, Utah VA medical center to provide genomic services and counseling as a part of VA Patient Care Services. For Veterans for whom in-person genetic counseling in not feasible, GMS conducts counseling either via telephone or videoconferencing. Although both of these methods can be effective for delivering genetic counseling, each has its relative advantages and disadvantages. The specific aim of this study is to gain a better understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of these two modalities. This information will be useful not only for genetic counseling but also other interventions that use telephone or videoconferencing to access patients.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 50 or greater,
  • a finding of 10 or more lifetime adenomatous polyps or sessile polyps,
  • no contributing family history,
  • and the patient must be able to be reached by telephone and speak English

Exclusion Criteria

  • Complex family history (family members with other cancers) or one suggestive of a known colon cancer syndrome,
  • unwillingness to travel to a VA site with videoconferencing capability,
  • diagnosis of colon cancer
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02108977). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search