Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=129 Randomized Single-blind Prevention

Ultrasound-guided Versus Direct Palpation Radial Artery Catheter Insertion Among Cardiac Anesthesiologists

Time to Insertion of Radial Artery Cannulation

Enrolled (actual)
129
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2015
Primary outcome: Primary: Time to Successful Radial Arterial Catheterization — 104; 104 seconds

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Ultrasound-guided Radial Artery Catheter Insertion (Device); Direct Palpation-guided Radial Artery Catheter insertion (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 19+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of British Columbia
Primary completion
May 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Time to Successful Radial Arterial Catheterization
104; 104
SECONDARY
Number of Attempts
1; 1
SECONDARY
Number of Re-directions
2; 3
SECONDARY
Complication Rate (Hematoma)
22.6; 11.1

Summary

When a patient undergoes heart surgery, their Anesthesiologist will insert a tiny plastic tube, called a catheter, in the artery of the patient's wrist. This is called a radial artery catheter. A radial artery catheter allows accurate measurement of the patient's blood pressure during surgery. There are two common techniques for placing the radial artery catheter. The first is a "blind" technique whereby the Anesthesiologist feels for the pulse in the patient's wrist and places the catheter using the location of the pulse as a guide. The second technique, less commonly used, is one whereby the Anesthesiologist uses an ultrasound machine (painless to the patient) to "see" the artery, and thereby uses the ultrasound to guide the catheter placement. Our study will test the hypothesis that ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization will have faster insertion times, with fewer complications compared with palpation-guided insertion.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients undergoing cardiac surgery
  • Age 19 or older
  • Provided written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Suspected inability to comply with study procedures, including language difficulties or medical history and/or concomitant disease, as judged by the investigator
  • Previous surgery at the site of proposed radial artery catheterization
  • Any vascular condition that may preclude eligibility for radial artery line insertion as judged by the investigator
  • Patients with ventricular assist devices
  • Previous inclusion in this study
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02118441). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search