Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=5 Randomized Single-blind Basic Science

Comparison of the Functional Walking Outcomes of Two Settings of a Commercially Available AFO in Adult Stroke Patients

Walking Aided by a Leg Brace in Stroke Subjects

Enrolled (actual)
5
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Self-selected Walking Velocity — 0.71; 0.74 m/s

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
ADR™ brace resistance (Device); Conventional brace resistance (using hard stops) (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 21+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Albert Einstein Healthcare Network
Primary completion
Oct 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Self-selected Walking Velocity
0.71; 0.74
PRIMARY
Step Length Symmetry
0.98; 0.96
PRIMARY
Step Time Symmetry
1.03; 0.99
SECONDARY
Joint Kinematics
SECONDARY
Joint Kinetics
SECONDARY
Activity (Step Count)
SECONDARY
Subject Opinions

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how two different settings of a commercially available ankle foot brace affect how stroke patients walk. The study brace is an ankle foot orthosis (AFO) that makes use of a newer type of joint that contains a soft insert, in addition to the conventional hard stops, to limit the range of motion of the ankle during walking. The results of this study will help to clarify 1) whether and how this new joint affects the way you walk, 2) whether it makes it easier for the clinician to align your brace and 3) your opinions about the new joint.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Between the ages of 21 and 70 males and non-pregnant females
  • Diagnosis of stroke more than 1 year ago
  • Ambulatory at 0.5m/s or greater
  • Require unilateral AFOs to ambulate
  • Stable medical condition - no concomitant progressive diseases that could affect motor function
  • Ability to comply with directions and cooperate with research team

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects who are currently receiving physical therapy for gait problems
  • Anticipated surgical or pharmacologic intervention for tone/contractures during the study period
  • Additional neurologic or musculoskeletal diagnoses that might impair gait (i.e., recent orthopedic interventions (6 weeks), unhealed fractures, significant degenerative joint disease, lower limb amputation, uncontrolled seizures)
  • Recent cardiac or active pulmonary disease, liable blood pressure
  • Recent back surgery
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02122783). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search