Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=97

A Comparison of Ropivacaine Alone Versus Combination of Dexamethasone and Clonidine for Block

Upper Extremity Surgery

Enrolled (actual)
97
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Duration of the Sensorial Supraclavicular Block — 13.4; 14; 17.4; 18.8 hour

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Ropivacaine (Drug); Ropivacaine and dexamethasone (Drug); Ropivacaine and clonidine (Drug); Ropivacaine, dexamethasone and clonidine (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Primary completion
Apr 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Duration of the Sensorial Supraclavicular Block
13.4; 14; 17.4; 18.8
SECONDARY
Postoperative Analgesia
0; 0; 0; 0

Summary

The aim of this randomized, observer-blinded study is to evaluate the postoperative analgesic efficacy of adding dexamethasone and clonidine to ropivacaine in supraclavicular nerve block. The investigators hypothesized that addition of dexamethasone and clonidine to ropivacaine would prolong the duration of analgesia in supraclavicular nerve block compared with ropivacaine alone.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Men and women 18-80 years old
  • Undergoing upper extremity surgery
  • Receiving Supraclavicular block
  • Receiving ropivacaine, ropivacaine adjuvants (dexamethasone, clonidine) for the supraclavicular nerve block.
  • Able to give Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Age less than 18 and greater than 80 years
  • Inability to understand the study procedures
  • Significant respiratory dysfunction
  • Preexisting neurologic deficits
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • A bleeding diathesis or on anticoagulants
  • Systemic glucocorticoid use
  • Refuse to participate in the study
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02151487). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search