Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=311 Randomized Double-blind Prevention

Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis of Intravenous Esomeprazole in Chinese Seriously Ill Patients

Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02157376 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
311
Serious AEs
8.7%
Results posted
Jan 2017
Primary outcomePrimary: The Percent of Patients With Clinically Significant Upper-GI Bleeding During the Treatment Evaluation Phase — 2.7; 4.6 % of participants — p=0.393
◆ Published Evidence
Emerging
18citations · ~2 / year
Prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill Chinese patients: a randomized, double-blind study evaluating esomeprazole and cimetidine.
Current medical research and opinion · 2018 · Likely link

Summary

The efficacy of esomeprazole will be compared versus cimetidine (a drug that previously demonstrated prevention of bleeding events) during treatment period in proportion of patients for the prevention of upper GI bleeding.

Linked Publications

  • Prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill Chinese patients: a randomized, double-blind study evaluating esomeprazole and cimetidine.
    Current medical research and opinion · 2018 · 18 citations · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
The Percent of Patients With Clinically Significant Upper-GI Bleeding During the Treatment Evaluation Phase
2.7; 4.6 0.393
SECONDARY
Proportion of Patients With Any Overt Upper-GI Bleeding (Significant and Non-significant) During the Treatment Evaluation Phase
0.109; 0.105

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Critically ill patients
  • Requirement for mechanical ventilation
  • At least one major risk factor for stress ulcer related bleeding

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of gastric or oesophageal surgery
  • Evidence of active GI bleeding
  • Advanced renal disease
  • Treatment with any Proton Pump Inhibitors
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02157376) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search