Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=311 Randomized Double-blind Prevention

Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis of Intravenous Esomeprazole in Chinese Seriously Ill Patients

Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis

Enrolled (actual)
311
Serious AEs
8.7%
Results posted
Jan 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: The Percent of Patients With Clinically Significant Upper-GI Bleeding During the Treatment Evaluation Phase — 2.7; 4.6 % of participants — p=0.393

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Esomeprazole (Drug); Cimetidine (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
AstraZeneca
Primary completion
Feb 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
The Percent of Patients With Clinically Significant Upper-GI Bleeding During the Treatment Evaluation Phase
2.7; 4.6 0.393
SECONDARY
Proportion of Patients With Any Overt Upper-GI Bleeding (Significant and Non-significant) During the Treatment Evaluation Phase
0.109; 0.105

Summary

The efficacy of esomeprazole will be compared versus cimetidine (a drug that previously demonstrated prevention of bleeding events) during treatment period in proportion of patients for the prevention of upper GI bleeding.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Critically ill patients
  • Requirement for mechanical ventilation
  • At least one major risk factor for stress ulcer related bleeding

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of gastric or oesophageal surgery
  • Evidence of active GI bleeding
  • Advanced renal disease
  • Treatment with any Proton Pump Inhibitors
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02157376). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search