Phase 3
Completed N=359
A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Etrolizumab Treatment in Maintenance of Disease Remission in Ulcerative Colitis (UC) Participants Who Are Naive to Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inhibitors
Colitis, Ulcerative
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02165215 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
359
Serious AEs
6.2%
Results posted
Jun 2021
Primary outcomePrimary: Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants in Remission at Week 62 Among Randomized Participants With a Clinical Response at Week 10, as Determined by the Mayo Clinic Score (MCS) — 29.6; 20.6 percentage of participants — p=0.1942
◆ Published Evidence
Established
87citations · ~15 / year
Etrolizumab for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: An Overview of the Phase 3 Clinical Program.
Summary
This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-grouped, placebo-controlled, multicenter study will investigate the efficacy and safety of etrolizumab in maintenance of remission in participants with moderately to severely active UC who are naive to TNF inhibitors and refractory to or intolerant of prior immunosuppressant and/or corticosteroid treatment.
Linked Publications (3)
-
Etrolizumab for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: An Overview of the Phase 3 Clinical Program.
-
Etrolizumab for maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (LAUREL): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study.
-
Impact of missing patient report outcomes in clinical trials for ulcerative colitis: Should we always assume treatment failure?
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants in Remission at Week 62 Among Randomized Participants With a Clinical Response at Week 10, as Determined by the Mayo Clinic Score (MCS) |
29.6; 20.6 | 0.1942 |
| SECONDARY Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Clinical Remission at Week 62 Among Randomized Participants in Clinical Remission at Week 10, as Determined by the MCS |
44.4; 27.3 | 0.1524 |
| SECONDARY Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission at Week 62, as Determined by the MCS |
30.6; 20.6 | 0.1466 |
| SECONDARY Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants in Remission at Week 62 Among Randomized Participants in Remission at Week 10, as Determined by the MCS |
40.0; 26.8 | 0.3083 |
| SECONDARY Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Endoscopic Appearance of the Mucosa at Week 62, as Determined by the MCS Endoscopic Subscore |
38.0; 22.5 | 0.0235 sig |
| SECONDARY Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 62, as Determined by the MCS Endoscopic Subscore |
30.6; 16.7 | 0.0293 sig |
| SECONDARY Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Histologic Remission at Week 62, as Determined by the Nancy Histological Index |
42.4; 21.8 | 0.0075 sig |
| SECONDARY Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 62 Among Participants Who Were Receiving Corticosteroids at Baseline, as Determined by the MCS |
18.2; 8.0 | 0.1415 |
| SECONDARY Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid-Free Remission at Week 62 Among Participants Who Were Receiving Corticosteroids at Baseline, as Determined by the MCS |
18.2; 8.0 | 0.1415 |
| SECONDARY Maintenance Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 62 in UC Bowel Movement Signs and Symptoms, as Assessed by the Ulcerative Colitis Patient-Reported Outcome Signs and Symptoms (UC-PRO/SS) Questionnaire |
-9.6; -6.7 | 0.0266 sig |
| SECONDARY Maintenance Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 62 in UC Functional Symptoms, as Assessed by the UC-PRO/SS Questionnaire |
-3.0; -1.8 | 0.0175 sig |
| SECONDARY Maintenance Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 62 in Health-Related Quality of Life, as Assessed by the Overall Score of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) |
66.9; 64.8 | 0.6331 |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event by Severity, According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0) |
95; 24; 23; 58; 30; 44 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation |
9; 5; 9 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Serious Infection-Related Adverse Events |
6; 2; 2 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Infection-Related Adverse Events by Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 |
39; 18; 22; 21; 17; 10 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reactions by Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 |
8; 4; 3; 0; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Hypersensitivity Reaction Events by Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 |
0; 0; 0; 1; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Malignancies |
0; 2; 1 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATAs) to Etrolizumab |
62; 35; 33 | — |
| SECONDARY Maintenance Phase: Etrolizumab Serum Trough Concentration (for Arms/Timepoints Above LLOQ) |
7.66; 7.63; 10; 10; 15.4 | — |
| SECONDARY Maintenance Phase: Etrolizumab Serum Trough Concentration (for Arms/Timepoints Below LLOQ) |
0.0963; 0.0400; 0.0400 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) established at least 3 months prior to Day 1 by clinical and endoscopic evidence
- Moderately to severely active UC as determined by an MCS of 6-12 with an endoscopic subscore greater than or equal to (≥)2 as determined by the central reading procedure (endoscopy to be performed 4-16 days prior to Day 1), a rectal bleeding subscore ≥1, and a stool frequency subscore ≥1 during the screening period (prior to Day 1)
- Evidence of UC extending a minimum of 20 centimeters (cm) from the anal verge as determined by baseline endoscopy (flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy) performed during screening, 4-16 days prior to Day 1
- Naive to treatment with any anti-TNF therapy
- Participants must have had an inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerance to prior corticosteroid and/or immunosuppressant treatment
- Background regimen for UC may include oral 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA), oral corticosteroids, budesonide, probiotics, azathioprine (AZA), 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), or methotrexate (MTX) if doses have been stable during the screening period
- Use of highly effective contraception
- Must have received a colonoscopy within the past year or be willing to undergo a colonoscopy in lieu of a flexible sigmoidoscopy at screening
Exclusion Criteria
- A history of or current conditions and diseases affecting the digestive tract, such as indeterminate colitis, suspicion of ischemic colitis, radiation colitis, or microscopic colitis, Crohn's disease, fistulas or abdominal abscesses, colonic mucosal dysplasia, intestinal obstruction, toxic megacolon, or unremoved adenomatous colonic polyps
- Prior or planned surgery for UC
- Past or present ileostomy or colostomy
- Any prior treatment with etrolizumab or other anti-integrin agents (including natalizumab, vedolizumab, and efalizumab) as stated in the protocol
- Any prior treatment with anti-adhesion molecules (such as mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule [MAdCAM-1])
- Any prior treatment with rituximab
- Any treatment with tofacitinib during screening
- Cogenital or acquired immune deficiency, chronic hepatitis B or C infection, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive, or history of tuberculosis (active or latent)
- Evidence of or treatment for Clostridium difficile within 60 days prior to Day 1 or other intestinal pathogens within 30 days prior to Day 1
- History of recurrent opportunistic infections and/or severe disseminated viral infections
- History of organ transplant
- Any major episode of infection requiring treatment with intravenous (IV) antibiotics within 8 weeks prior to screening or oral antibiotics within 4 weeks prior to screening
- Received a live attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks prior to Day 1
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02165215) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.