Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=39 Randomized Treatment

Efficacy of Percussive Ventilation Therapy (MetaNeb ®) Compared With Mucolytic Agents for Atelectasis in the Mechanically Ventilated Pediatric Patient

Atelectasis

Enrolled (actual)
39
Serious AEs
2.6%
Results posted
Mar 2015
Primary outcome: Primary: Improvement of Atelectasis — 6; 7; 3; 6 participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
continuous high frequency oscillator (CHFO) (Device); Acetylcysteine (Drug); dornase alfa (Drug)
Age
Pediatric, Adult
Sex
All
Sponsor
Duke University
Primary completion
May 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Improvement of Atelectasis
6; 7; 3; 6; 4; 3
SECONDARY
Change in Capnography (Vd/Vt)
-0.04; 0.03
SECONDARY
Change in Quantity and Quality of Suctioned Mucus

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a therapy that uses a machine called a continuous high frequency oscillator (CHFO) is more successful at removing mucus than medications that thin out the mucus.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Informed consent from parent or legal guardian.
  • Age < 18 years and admitted to the PICU or PCICU.
  • Conventionally ventilated.
  • Mucolytics are being initiated by clinical team for treatment of atelectasis.
  • Endotracheal tube ≥ 3.5 mm internal diameter.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Receiving chronic mucolytic or continuous high frequency oscillation therapy.
  • Clinically significant pleural effusion.
  • Status post cardiothoracic surgery with open chest.
  • Pneumothorax.
  • Pulmonary hemorrhage.
  • Escalating doses of vasoactive agents (i.e. dopamine or epinephrine).
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02168387). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search