Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 1 N=33 Treatment

Nintedanib in Volunteers With Hepatic Impairment Compared With Healthy Volunteers

Hepatic Insufficiency

Enrolled (actual)
33
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: AUC (0-inf) of Nintedanib — 200; 674; 92.7; 77.8 ng*h/mL

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Interventions
Nintedanib (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
Primary completion
Dec 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
AUC (0-inf) of Nintedanib
200; 674; 92.7; 77.8
PRIMARY
Cmax of Nintedanib
20.5; 59.4; 9.25; 7.81
SECONDARY
AUC (0-tz) of Nintedanib
193; 652; 89.2; 74.8
SECONDARY
Number (%) of Subjects With Drug-related Adverse Events (AEs)
0.0; 37.5; 17.6

Summary

The primary objective of this study is to investigate the effect of mild (Child-Pugh A, score 5-6) and moderate (Child-Pugh B, score 7-9) hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of nintedanib, in comparison with a control group with normal hepatic function following oral administration of nintedanib as single dose.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion criteria

Healthy subjects:

  • Male or female subject, healthy according to the investigator's judgement based on a complete medical history, including a physical examination, vital signs (BP, PR), 12-lead ECG, and clinical laboratory
  • Age of 18 to 79 years at screening visit

Hepatically impaired patients as determined by a hepatologist/ gastroenterologist:

  • A documented diagnosis of the impaired hepatic function, determined by hepatologist/gastroenterologist/specialist for internal medicine, must be available in the patient´s source data.
  • Male or female chronic hepatically impaired patient as determined by screening results and classified as Child-Pugh A (Child-Pugh score of 5-6 points) or as Child-Pugh B (Child-Pugh score of 7-9 points). Hepatic insufficiency must be diagnosed at least 3 months before screening.
  • Age of 18 to 79 years at screening visit

Exclusion criteria

Healthy subjects:

  • Any finding in the medical examination (including BP, PR or ECG) deviating from normal and judged as clinically relevant by the investigator
  • Any laboratory value outside the reference range at screening visit that the investigator considers to be of clinical relevance
  • Gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, respiratory, cardiovascular, metabolic, immunological or hormonal disorders judged as clinically relevant by the investigator
  • Surgery of the gastrointestinal tract that could interfere with kinetics of the trial medication based on the investigator´s judgment
  • Women who are breast feeding or of child-bearing potential not using a highly effective method of birth control for at least one month prior to inclusion and at least 3 month after administration of trial medication.

Hepatically impaired patients as determined by a hepatologist/gastroenterologist:

  • Medical disorder, condition or history of such that would impair the patient's ability to participate or complete this study in the opinion of the investigator or the sponsor
  • Patients with significant diseases other than underlying diagnose of hepatic impairment and concomitant diseases related to it. A significant disease is defined as a disease which in the opinion of the investigator:
  • put the patient at risk because of participation in the study
  • may influence the results of the study
  • is not in a stable condition
  • Surgery of the gastrointestinal tract that could interfere with the kinetics of the trial medication based on the investigator´s judgment
  • Women who are breast feeding or of child-bearing potential not using a highly effective method of birth control for at least one month prior to inclusion and at least 3 month after administration of trial medication
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02191865). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search