Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=86 Randomized Diagnostic

ENB-GS-TBLB for the Diagnosis of PPLs

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02207478 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
86
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2015
Primary outcomePrimary: The Difference of Diagnostic Value of ENB-GS-TBLB as Compared to GS-TBLB — 34; 25; 5; 16 participants — p=0.019

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy with a Guide Sheath(ENB-GS) for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) .

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
The Difference of Diagnostic Value of ENB-GS-TBLB as Compared to GS-TBLB
34; 25; 5; 16 0.019 sig
SECONDARY
The Duration Time Difference of ENB-GS-TBLB With Fluoroscopy as Compared to GS-TBLB With Fluoroscopy Alone
1053.6; 1056.6; 156.56; 142.27; 126.74; 224.98 0.843

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • clinical and imaging characteristics suggestive of maligancy
  • CT scan appearance of the PPLs showed the longest diameter was more than 1 cm and solid lesions.

Exclusion Criteria

  • The lesion is close to the pleural membrane
  • Refusal of participation
  • Severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction and other indications that can't receive bronchoscopy
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02207478). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search