N/A
N=60
Nasopharyngeal Versus Nasal Cannula Oxygen Supplementation in Surgery Patients
Oxygen Administration During Deep Sedation
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02219464 ↗Enrolled (actual)
60
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants With Oxygen Saturations Below 92% — 3; 12 Participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Nasopharyngeal catheter (Device); Nasal Cannula (Device); Oxygen Supplementation (Procedure); Sedation (Procedure)
- Age
- Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult · 16+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Vanderbilt University
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Number of Participants With Oxygen Saturations Below 92% |
3; 12 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Who Needed Airway Assistance Interventions |
4; 17 | — |
Summary
The investigators plan to conduct a randomized, controlled trial comparing nasopharyngeal oxygen supplementation to traditional nasal cannula in patients undergoing oral surgery under moderate sedation.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients greater than 16 years of age
- Patients who present for oral surgery or esophagoduodenography and colonoscopy
- Patients who undergo intravenous sedation
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients who require endotracheal intubation
- ASA class 4 or higher
- Existing esophageal disease such as a perforation or varices
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02219464). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.