N/A Completed N=60 Randomized Treatment

Nasopharyngeal Versus Nasal Cannula Oxygen Supplementation in Surgery Patients

Oxygen Administration During Deep Sedation

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02219464 ↗

Enrolled (actual)

Serious AEs

0.0%

Results posted

Jun 2017

Primary outcomePrimary: Number of Participants With Oxygen Saturations Below 92% — 3; 12 Participants

Summary

The investigators plan to conduct a randomized, controlled trial comparing nasopharyngeal oxygen supplementation to traditional nasal cannula in patients undergoing oral surgery under moderate sedation.

Outcome Measures

Outcome	Result	p-value
PRIMARY Number of Participants With Oxygen Saturations Below 92%	3; 12	—
SECONDARY Number of Participants Who Needed Airway Assistance Interventions	4; 17	—

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Patients greater than 16 years of age
Patients who present for oral surgery or esophagoduodenography and colonoscopy
Patients who undergo intravenous sedation

Exclusion Criteria

Patients who require endotracheal intubation
ASA class 4 or higher
Existing esophageal disease such as a perforation or varices

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02219464). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.