Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=339 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Study to Assess Clinical Response of Duloxetine in Patients Hospitalized for Severe Depression

Depressive Disorder, Major

Enrolled (actual)
339
Serious AEs
3.6%
Results posted
Oct 2023
Primary outcome: Primary: Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score From Baseline to Week 4 — -20.1; -19.9 Units on a scale — p=0.88

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Duloxetine (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
Primary completion
Aug 2008

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score From Baseline to Week 4
-20.1; -19.9 0.88
SECONDARY
Change in Hamilton Depression 6-item Scale (HAMD-6) Total Score From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 3 and Week 4
-3.1; -2.7; -5.8; -5.2; -7.2; -6.8 0.86
SECONDARY
Change in Hamilton Depression 6-item Scale (HAMD-6) Total Score From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 8 - by Post-week 4 Treatment Groups
-11.6; -6.4; -11.8; -5.5; -12.3; -7.6 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score From Baseline to Week 1, 2 and Week 3
-8.3; -7.6; -14.7; -13.5; -18.1; -16.9
SECONDARY
Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 8 - by Post-week 4 Treatment Groups
-28.3; -16.1; -28.1; -14.8; -29.8; -19.0 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Responders at Week 1, 2, 3 and Week 4 According to Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Scale
14.5; 8.2; 33.7; 31.2; 50.0; 46.5 0.32
SECONDARY
Percentage of Responders at Week 6 and Week 8 According to Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Scale - by Post-week 4 Treatment Groups
94.8; 52.9; 98.1; 39.1; 93.8; 65.7
SECONDARY
Percentage of Responders at Week 1, 2, 3 and Week 4 According to Hamilton Depression 6-item Scale (HAMD-6)
12.0; 10.0; 32.5; 26.5; 42.8; 44.1 0.57
SECONDARY
Percentage of Responders at Week 6 and Week 8 According to Hamilton Depression 6-item Scale (HAMD-6) - by Post-week 4 Treatment Group
90.6; 47.1; 90.6; 31.3; 92.7; 60.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Patients Reaching Remission at Week 8
11.5; 58.6; 11.3; 71.9; 88.5; 41.4
SECONDARY
Clinical Global Impressions Scales of Severity of Illness (CGI-SI): Number of Patients Per Score at Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3 and Week 4
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0 0.68
SECONDARY
Clinical Global Impressions Scales of Severity of Illness (CGI-SI): Number of Patients Per Score at Week 6 and Week 8 - by Post-week 4 Treatment Groups
38; 1; 41; 2; 31; 9 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale: Number of Patients Per Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and Week 4
5; 2; 29; 25; 75; 84 0.07
SECONDARY
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale: Number of Patients Per Score at Week 6 and Week 8 - by Post-week 4 Treatment Groups
55; 6; 61; 6; 35; 39
SECONDARY
Patient Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I) Score: Number of Patients Per Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and Week 4
2; 0; 7; 7; 45; 26 1.00
SECONDARY
Patient Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I) Score: Number of Patients Per Score at Week 6 and Week 8 - by Post-week 4 Treatment Groups
0; 1; 0; 0; 48; 7
SECONDARY
Change in Hamilton Scale of Anxiety (HAMA) Score From Baseline to Week 4
-13.0; -13.6 0.92
SECONDARY
Change in Hamilton Scale of Anxiety (HAMA) Score From Baseline to Week 8 - by Post-week 4 Treatment Groups
-19.6; -12.1; -21.0; -10.8 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Reason for Living (RFL) Questionaire at Baseline
3.8; 3.7
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Reason for Living (RFL) Questionnaire - by Post-week 4 Treatment Groups
0.7; 0.4; 0.8; 0.1 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Patients With Intake of Concomitant Medication for Anxiety and Sleep
65; 59; 93; 88; 95; 89
SECONDARY
Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event
97; 89
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure to Week 4 and Week 8
2.0; 0.5; 2.5; 2.0; 1.9; 0.7
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Weight to Week 4 and Week 8
0.1; 0.0; 0.5; 0.1
SECONDARY
Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Findings
0; 1; 0; 0; 0; 1
SECONDARY
Number of Patients Withdrawn Due to Adverse Events
11; 9

Summary

Study to assess efficacy of Duloxetine 120 mg and Duloxetine 60 mg in patients hospitalized for severe depression after 4 weeks of treatment. To evaluate the rescue option in non-responding patients. Safety of Duloxetine will also be assessed.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male or female patients of 18 years of age at the screening visit or older
  • Meet criteria for severe Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
  • Montgomery-Asberg-depression rating scale (MADRS) total score ≥ 30 and the 6-item Hamilton Depression scale (HAMD-6) score ≥12 at both screening (V1) visit and baseline (V2) visits
  • Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-Severity) score ≥4 at both screening visit and baseline visit.
  • Requirement of hospitalization (not for social or other non-medical reasons) at screening visit and at least up to Visit 4
  • Patient willing and able to comply with the requirement for hospitalization and with all scheduled visits, tests and procedures required by the protocol
  • Have a level of understanding sufficient to provide informed consent and to communicate with the investigators and site personnel. Informed consent document must be signed at screening visit, in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and local regulatory requirements, prior to any study procedure

Exclusion Criteria

  • More than two previous episodes of major depression that did not respond to adequate doses and duration (minimum of 6 weeks) of two different antidepressant therapies
  • Lack of response to at least two antidepressant therapies given at adequate doses for at least 6 weeks for the current depressive episode
  • Concurrent presence of symptoms fulfilling criteria for any Axis I disorder other than anxiety disorders (with exception of the Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD)) or Major Depressive Disorder, in the investigator's judgment
  • Any previous diagnosis of a bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or OCD
  • Depression with catatonic features, depression with post-partum onset, or organic mental disorders
  • The presence of an Axis II disorder
  • MDD with psychotic features requiring neuroleptic treatment and/or interfering with patient's ability to provide informed consent, at investigator's discretion
  • History of substance abuse or dependence within the past year, excluding nicotine and caffeine, but including alcohol or benzodiazepines
  • Positive urine screen for drug abuse (cannabinoids, cocaine, opiates including methadone, or amphetamines) at screening
  • Epilepsy or a history of seizure disorder or of a treatment with anticonvulsant medication for epilepsy or seizures
  • Patients with acute liver injury (such as hepatitis) or severe cirrhosis (such as Child-Pugh Class C)
  • Known diagnosis of congenital galactosaemia, glucose or galactose malabsorption syndrome, or lactose deficiency
  • Patient with a known diagnosis of raised intraocular pressure, or at known risk of acute narrow-angle glaucoma
  • Serious medical illness or clinically significant laboratory abnormalities that, in the judgment of the investigator, are likely to require intervention/exclusion of study medication during the course of the study: cardiovascular (e.g. uncontrolled hypertension, abnormal initial ECG findings according to investigator judgement), respiratory, haematological, hepatic or gastrointestinal
  • End stage renal disease (estimated creatinine clearance ≤30 mL/min) and undergoing dialysis
  • Abnormal thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentrations, based on the performing laboratory's reference ranges. Patients must be clinically and chemically euthyroid at the time of randomization. Patients may be taking thyroid replacement therapy provided their dose is stable and their compliance is good for at least three months before the screening visit
  • Pregnancy (to be excluded by urine pregnancy test at screening visit) or breast-feeding
  • Sexually active woman of childbearing potential (i.e. not 6 months post-menopausal, or not surgically sterilized) not using a medically approved method of birth control (i.e. oral contraceptives, intrauterine device, or double-barrier) for at least one month prior to the screening visit and throughout the study
  • Participation in another clinical tri
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02229825). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search