Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=196

Survey on Anemia Therapy in Participants With Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Not on Dialysis

Chronic Kidney Diseases

Enrolled (actual)
196
Serious AEs
1.5%
Results posted
Nov 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Participants by ESA Types at Baseline — 51.5; 17.3; 10.7; 20.4 percentage of participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
ESA (Drug); Satisfaction Survey Questionnaire (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Primary completion
Aug 2013

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants by ESA Types at Baseline
51.5; 17.3; 10.7; 20.4
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants by ESA Types at Month 6
43.7; 19.2; 12.6; 24.5
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants by Frequency of ESA Use at Baseline
2.6; 7.2; 14.9; 26.2; 38.5; 10.8
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants by Frequency of ESA Use at Month 6
1.3; 4.0; 15.9; 25.2; 39.1; 14.6
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants by Frequency and Types of ESA Used at Baseline
2.0; 4.0; 1.0; 26.0; 67.0; 0
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants by Frequency and Types of ESA Used at Month 6
1.5; 1.5; 0; 18.2; 71.2; 7.6
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants by Different CKD Stages
2.0; 1.3; 10.2; 13.9; 37.8; 41.7
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants by Different Injection Administration Modes
18.4; 23.2; 16.8; 17.9; 3.6; 3.3
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Interest in Learning to Inject Independently
6.3; 4.3
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants by Need for Improvement in Treatment Frequency
94.9; 96.0; 1.5; 1.3; 1.5; 1.3
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants by Need for Improvement in Treatment Frequency by ESA Type
98.0; 2.0; 0; 0; 0; 94.1
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants by Preferred Treatment Frequency
63.8; 49.0; 17.3; 23.8; 12.8; 17.2
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants by Preferred Treatment Frequency by ESA Type
83.2; 75.8; 14.9; 15.2; 1.0; 3.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants by Preferred Treatment Frequency by Baseline ESA Frequency
80.0; 50.0; 28.6; 0; 27.6; 12.5
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants by Limitation of Daily Life Due to ESA Refrigeration Requirements
96.4; 97.4; 1.0; 0.7; 0; 1.3
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants by Limitation of Daily Life Due to ESA Refrigeration Requirements by ESA Types
97.0; 1.0; 0; 2.0; 100.0; 0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants by Convenience of Syringe Usage
2.0; 2.6; 6.6; 88.8; 0.7; 2.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants by Convenience of Syringe Usage by ESA Type
4.0; 1.0; 5.0; 90.1; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants by Injection Site Pain
88.8; 92.1; 8.2; 6.0; 1.5; 1.3
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants by Injection Site Pain by ESA Type
92.1; 6.9; 1.0; 0; 0; 97.0

Summary

This study is a prospective, non-interventional, cross-sectional multicenter survey. The aim is to better understand the current therapy pattern for anemia in CKD treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and not on-dialysis participant population in Israel. Participating physicians will be requested to interview eligible participants with CKD not on dialysis and to complete for them a satisfaction survey for anemia treatment. The survey will be completed twice, once at study start and once at six months' follow-up.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult participants with CKD Stage 3-5
  • Treated with ESAs
  • Participant is speaking the same language as the investigator interviewer

Exclusion Criteria

  • Past or current treatment with dialysis
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02238067). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search