Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Early Phase 1 N=40 Treatment

Anal Resting Pressure After Bidet, Compared to Sitz Bath

Anorectal Disorders

Enrolled (actual)
40
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Anal Resting Pressure Change — 90.2; 71.3; 88.1; 69.6 mmHg

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Early Phase 1
Interventions
Electronic bidet (Device); Sitz bath (Device)
Age
Adult · 20+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Primary completion
Apr 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Anal Resting Pressure Change
90.2; 71.3; 88.1; 69.6
SECONDARY
Convenience

Summary

Sitz bath is conventional and empirical remedy and commonly recommended for non-operative treatment of various anal diseases. However, as there was no substitute for sitz bath until now, the patients have to accept the inconvenience for treatment of their diseases. Electronic bidet is used with convenience as automatic device for cleansing the perineal area, especially after defecation. The similarity of contacting water to perineal area, clinical use of electronic bidet has been suggested for treatment of anal diseases. However, there had been few reports of clinical use of electronic bidet. Investigators performed the study to evaluate the effects of electronic bidet on anal resting pressure, compared to conventional warm sitz bath in normal healthy volunteers.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • health volunteers

Exclusion Criteria

  • anorectal disorder
  • medical comorbidities
  • pregnancy
  • history of vaginal delivery
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02244840). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search