Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=50 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Ranolazine Among Unrevascularized Chronic Stable Angina Patients

Angina

Enrolled (actual)
50
Serious AEs
18.0%
Results posted
Dec 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 Weeks — 48; 50; 40; 60 units on a scale — p=>0.05

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Ranolazine (Drug); Sugar pill (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
North Florida Foundation for Research and Education
Primary completion
May 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 Weeks
48; 50; 40; 60; -7; 6 >0.05
SECONDARY
Subjective Well Being
9; 6; 12; 16; 1; 2 0.58
SECONDARY
Ischemia Driven Revascularization or Hospitalization
3; 5 >0.05

Summary

This is a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, single-center (North Florida- South Georgia VA Medical Center) study. The study objective is to determine if ranolazine improves angina symptoms at 4 months compared with placebo among stable coronary artery disease patients who have demonstrable myocardial ischemia, but who do not undergo revascularization

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult patients >= 18 years of age referred for cardiac catheterization for evaluation of cardiac symptoms ( angina, fatigue, or shortness of breath)
  • At least 1 indeterminate stenosis (20-80%),
  • Fractional flow reserve (FFR) 500 milliseconds
  • use of strong inhibitors of CTP3A (i.e. ketoconazole, itraconazole, clarithromycin,nefazodone, nelfinavir, ritonavir, indinavir and saquinavir)
  • use of inducers of CYP3A (i.e. rifampin, rifabutin, rifapentine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine, and St. John's wort)
  • liver cirrhosis
  • sever renal insufficiency (i.e. creatinine clearance < 30mL/min/1.73 m2)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02265796). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search