Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=40

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) Patient Positioning in EOS System®

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Enrolled (actual)
40
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Impact of the Patients' Arm Positioning on Clinical Evaluation of Bi-planar Spinal X-rays Using the EOS System - Spinal Sagittal Plane Parameters — 5.9; 7.6; 29.5; 33.55 degrees

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
EOS® imaging system (Device)
Age
Pediatric, Adult · 10+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Primary completion
Aug 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Impact of the Patients' Arm Positioning on Clinical Evaluation of Bi-planar Spinal X-rays Using the EOS System - Spinal Sagittal Plane Parameters
5.9; 7.6; 29.5; 33.55; 19.8; 22.6
PRIMARY
Impact of the Patients' Arm Positioning on Clinical Evaluation of Bi-planar Spinal X-rays Using the EOS System - Frontal Spinal Plane Parameters
23.5; 27.7; 50.3; 51.3; 43.9; 41.3
PRIMARY
Impact of the Patients' Arm Positioning on Clinical Evaluation of Bi-planar Spinal X-rays Using the EOS System - Transverse Plane Parameters
-10.8; -12.0; 14.6; 13.7
PRIMARY
Impact of the Patients' Arm Positioning on Clinical Evaluation of Bi-planar Spinal X-rays Using the EOS System - Pelvic Sagittal Plane Parameters
51.0; 50.6; 44.1; 49.9; 6.8; 9.5
PRIMARY
Impact of the Patients' Arm Positioning on Clinical Evaluation of Bi-planar Spinal X-rays Using the EOS System - Pressure Mat Parameters
44.9; 44.0; 44.2; 55.0; 55.9; 55.7

Summary

The EOS® imaging system, a new imaging modality which offers low dose, weight bearing and full body X-ray imaging, requires a new standing position where patients put their hands and forearms on the wall vertically for stability. Although this method provides enough support for the patients during the extended X-ray acquisition time, its impact on the postural balance and sagittal profile of the spine and sacro-pelvic parameters has not been evaluated. The goal of this study is to identify the impact of patients' arm positioning on the sagittal profile and postural balance of the patient and subsequently propose a standardized method for full spine X-ray acquisition in the EOS® imaging system.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects age 10-18
  • Diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
  • Prescribed bi-planar full spine X-ray images
  • Must be able to stand still for 10 seconds without any support
  • Must be able to follow verbal and visual instruction

Exclusion Criteria

  • Previous surgical treatment
  • Diagnosis of a neuro-muscular disorder
  • Have supernumerary vertebrae, congenital deformities, spondylolisthesis, or spina bifida
  • Have any other musculoskeletal disorder that impacts standing balance such as hip, knee, ankle pain and instability or lower back pain
  • BMI higher than 30
  • Pregnant or lactating females
  • Parents/guardians or subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, may be non-compliant with study schedules or procedures
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02269657). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search