Phase 3
Completed N=100
Study Assessing The Interest of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging With Radioisotope Method For Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients With Breast Cancer
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02279108 ↗Enrolled (actual)
100
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2018
Primary outcomePrimary: Number of Patients With Less Than Two Lymph Nodes Detected — 22; 20 Participants
◆ Published Evidence
No publication linked
No peer-reviewed publication reporting this trial's results has been linked yet. This can indicate results are unpublished — a known publication-bias signal. We re-check periodically.
Summary
The sentinel node has a fundamental role in the management of early breast cancer.
Currently, the double detection of blue and radioisotope is recommended. A radioactive material requires the presence of a nuclear medicine department and the approval of health authorities. In many centers, this technique is not available. The use of blue is easier to implement technique. However, allergic reactions and prolonged breast tattoo led many teams to stop the practice.
So in common practice, many center use a single method. However, with a single detection, the risk of false negatives and the identification failure rate increased to a significant extent and the number of sentinel lymph node detected and removed is not enough.
Under these conditions, find another method of detection seems crucial. According to the literature, the fluorescence method (ICG) is a technique that seems safe and reliable.
The investigators therefore propose a prospective, randomized study to investigate the interest of fluorescence associated with the isotopic method.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Number of Patients With Less Than Two Lymph Nodes Detected |
22; 20 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Lymph Nodes ICG Positive and Tc Positive |
85 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Lymph Nodes ICG Positive and Tc Negative |
15 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Lymph Nodes ICG Negative and Tc Positive |
7 | — |
| SECONDARY Comparison Between Groups of the Time of the Surgery |
92.5; 76 | — |
| SECONDARY Comparison Between Groups of Anesthesia Time |
171; 152 | — |
| SECONDARY Time From Injection of One Dose ICG Injection to Incision Time |
17.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Comparison Between Groups of Time Surgery Node |
171; 162.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Patients With ICG Allergy |
0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Patients With ICG Allergy |
0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Patients With ICG Allergy |
0; 0 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Histologically proved infiltrating breast cancer (ductal, lobular carcinoma…) or a carcinoma in-situ with an elevated risk of micro-invasion. (High grade with necrosis, radiologically evaluated size more than 40mm, or immediate mastectomy…)
- Unifocal or multifocal but in same quarter
- Size < 5cm clinically palpable or not
- Clinically or ultrasound axillary N0
- Isotopic sentinel node detection
- Adult patient
- Signed informed consent by patient or legally responsable authority
- Patient registered to a social security system
- No surgical contra-indication
Exclusion Criteria
- Mammary carcinoma recurrence
- Previous same side mammary reduction
- Previous lumpectomy
- Contra-indication to surgery
- Pregnant or breast feeding patient
- Denial of participation
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02279108). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.