Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=87

Multicenter Clinical Observation PROMOS®

Primary and Secondary Omarthrosis

Enrolled (actual)
87
Serious AEs
35.6%
Results posted
Mar 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Radiological and Clinical Loosening Rates of the Glenoid and Humeral Components — 96.29 Percentage survivorship

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
standard PROMOS prosthesis (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics AG
Primary completion
Mar 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Radiological and Clinical Loosening Rates of the Glenoid and Humeral Components
96.29
SECONDARY
Constant Murley Score
72.80
SECONDARY
ASES Shoulder Score Index
76.88

Summary

Overall study design: This study is a prospective, multicenter, postmarket clinical observation to validate the PROMOS™ Standard Shoulder System as state-of-the-art implant system for total shoulder arthroplasty in terms of radiographic and clinical performance as well as long-term survivorship over 10 years.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • patient has no general medical contraindication to surgery
  • informed consent to participate in the observation signed by the patient
  • routine radiographic assessment is possible
  • patient is likely to comply with study follow-up requirements
  • primary total- or hemi-shoulder-arthroplasty to the affected side, unilateral or bilateral

Exclusion Criteria

  • acute shoulder trauma
  • tumor / malignoma
  • avascular necrosis
  • late stage rotator cuff disease
  • Charcot joint disease or other severe neurosensory deficits
  • high comorbidity
  • previously failed shoulder arthroplasty
  • fracture sequelae of proximal humerus
  • hypersensitivity to the implant materials used
  • addictive disorders such as alcohol or drug abuse
  • severe spinal disorders
  • bacterial infections
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02280499). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search