Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=150 Other

Thoracoabdominal Arortic CTA Study

Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02291718 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
150
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2017
Primary outcomePrimary: Radiation Dose — 35.1; 25.4; 25.5 mSv
◆ Published Evidence
No publication linked

No peer-reviewed publication reporting this trial's results has been linked yet. This can indicate results are unpublished — a known publication-bias signal. We re-check periodically.

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the contrast agents and imaging techniques used for thoracoabdominal aortic imaging in CT. Imaging parameters and contrast volume are changed and adjusted based on the contrast agent, since contrast agents have varying iodine concentrations. If the contrast iodine concentration is higher, it may be possible to adjust the imaging parameters and lower the overall radiation dose to the patient.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Radiation Dose
35.1; 25.4; 25.5
SECONDARY
Signal to Noise Ratio
12.0; 11.8; 13.8
SECONDARY
Hounsfield Unit Attenuation Values
289.7; 400.9; 393.9
SECONDARY
Variation in Contrast for the Entire Vascular System (coV)
0.113; 0.124; 0.107

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic (TAA) CTA
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) equal to or less than 30

Exclusion Criteria

  • Creatinine greater than 2.0
  • Allergy to contrast media
  • Pregnant women
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02291718). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search