Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=56 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Ketamine and Propofol for Upper Endoscopy

Anesthesia
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02295553 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
56
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: Dose of Propofol Required to Prevent Movement (Response) to Insertion of Endoscope Into the Patient's Esophagus — 6.1; 4.5; 4.7; 1.1 mg/kg
◆ Published Evidence
Established
28citations · ~4 / year
Determination of the median effective dose of propofol in combination with different doses of ketamine during gastro-duodenoscopy in children: a randomised controlled trial.
British journal of anaesthesia · 2018 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the dose-response relationship of ketamine in combination with propofol.

Linked Publications

  • Determination of the median effective dose of propofol in combination with different doses of ketamine during gastro-duodenoscopy in children: a randomised controlled trial.
    British journal of anaesthesia · 2018 · 28 citations · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Dose of Propofol Required to Prevent Movement (Response) to Insertion of Endoscope Into the Patient's Esophagus
6.1; 4.5; 4.7; 1.1
SECONDARY
Duration of Apnea After Propofol Administration
59; 45; 57; 39
SECONDARY
Incidence of Adverse Respiratory Events During the Procedure
11; 10; 11; 9; 1; 1
SECONDARY
Incidence of Side Effects and Complications During the Recovery Period
0; 0; 1; 0; 0; 0

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 3-13 years
  • Receiving general anesthesia for upper endoscopy

Exclusion Criteria

  • Known or possible difficult airway
  • BMI > 35
  • Weight < 10 kg
  • Sedative premedication required
  • Known contraindication to ketamine or propofol
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02295553) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search